Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36350943›Full record

ArticleDental press journal of orthodontics2022

Efficacy of products for bleaching and whitening under orthodontic brackets.

Célia Regina Maio Pinzan-Vercelino, Suellen Nogueira Linares Lima, Fernando Félix de Jesus Vieira Pereira, Júlio de Araújo Gurgel, Gisele Rodrigues da Silva, Karina Maria Salvatore de Freitas

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dental press journal of orthodontics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Célia Regina Maio Pinzan-VercelinoCentro Universitário Uningá, Departamento de Odontologia (Maringá/PR, Brazil). cepinzan@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5419-0079
Suellen Nogueira Linares LimaUniversidade Ceuma, Departamento de Odontologia (São Luís/MA, Brazil).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1156-2888
Fernando Félix de Jesus Vieira PereiraUniversidade Ceuma, Departamento de Odontologia (São Luís/MA, Brazil).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4265-9949
Júlio de Araújo GurgelUniversidade Estadual de São Paulo (UNESP) (Marília/SP, Brazil).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4205-0965
Gisele Rodrigues da SilvaUniversidade Federal de Uberlândia, Escola de Odontologia, Departamento de Dentística Operatória e Materiais Odontológicos (Uberlândia/MG, Brazil).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9358-1339
Karina Maria Salvatore de FreitasCentro Universitário Uningá, Departamento de Odontologia (Maringá/PR, Brazil).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9145-6334
Universidade Ceuma · BRCentro Universitário Una · BRUniversidade de Marília · BRUniversidade Estadual de Maringá · BRUniversidade Federal de Uberlândia · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMany patients wearing orthodontic appliances request alterations in the shade of their teeth during orthodontic treatment.

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of different products for bleaching and whitening under orthodontic brackets.

methodsSeventy bovine incisors were randomly divided into five groups (n = 14): C) non-whitening toothpaste (control); WTsi) hydrated silica whitening toothpaste; WThp) 2% hydrogen peroxide whitening toothpaste; OB) in-office bleaching; and HB) at-home bleaching. Two buccal surface areas were evaluated using the Easyshade spectrophotometer: under the metal bracket (experimental) and around the bracket (control). The paired t-test, ANOVA, and Tukey tests were applied for statistical analysis.

resultsIntragroup comparisons showed that in groups C, WThp and HB, there were statistically significant differences in the enamel color changes (ΔEab) between under and around the bracket areas (C - under bracket = 7.97 ± 2.35, around bracket = 2.86 ± 0.81, p< 0.01; WThp - under bracket = 4.69 ± 2.98, around bracket = 2.05 ± 1.41, p< 0.01; HB - under bracket = 7.41 ± 2.89, around bracket: 9.86 ± 3.32, p= 0.02). Groups WTsi, OB and HB presented similar perception of tooth whiteness (ΔWID) between the tested areas. Intergroup comparisons demonstrated that under the bracket area, the color change (ΔEab) was similar for all groups, except WThp (C = 7.97 ± 2.35; WTsi = 8.54 ± 3.63; WThp = 4.69 ± 2.98; OB = 9.31 ± 4.32; HB = 7.41 ± 2.89; p< 0.01).

conclusionsThe dental color changes were effective for the products tested in groups WTsi, OB and HB in the presence of metallic orthodontic brackets.

Indexed as

Orthodontic BracketsTooth BleachingTooth Bleaching AgentsAnimalsCattleColorDental EnamelHydrogen PeroxideToothpastesHydrogen PeroxideTooth Bleaching AgentsToothpastes

Identifiers

PMID36350943
PMCPMC9639618
OpenAlexW4308773720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.