Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36350921›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2022

Host circadian behaviors exert only weak selective pressure on the gut microbiome under stable conditions but are critical for recovery from antibiotic treatment.

Chi Zhao, Kevin Kelly, Maria Luísa Jabbur, Marcell Paguaga, Megan Behringer, Carl Hirschie Johnson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chi ZhaoDepartment of Biological Sciences & Vanderbilt Microbiome Initiative, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Kevin KellyDepartment of Biological Sciences & Vanderbilt Microbiome Initiative, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Maria Luísa JabburDepartment of Biological Sciences & Vanderbilt Microbiome Initiative, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Marcell PaguagaDepartment of Biological Sciences & Vanderbilt Microbiome Initiative, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Megan BehringerDepartment of Biological Sciences & Vanderbilt Microbiome Initiative, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Carl Hirschie JohnsonDepartment of Biological Sciences & Vanderbilt Microbiome Initiative, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2878-3193
Vanderbilt University · US

Funding

Overall: Eunice Kennedy Shriver Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center at VanderbiltP50HD103537 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Lea K Davis · 2020 to 2026
$10.3M
Circadian Programs in BacteriaR37GM067152 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI JOHNSON, CARL HIRSCHIE · 2015 to 2024
$4.1M
Regulation and Significance of Sustained Circadian OscillationsR01GM107434 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI JOHNSON, CARL HIRSCHIE · 2013 to 2024
$4.0M
Circadian Programs in BacteriaR01GM067152 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI JOHNSON, CARL HIRSCHIE · 2003 to 2014
$3.9M
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103537NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM067152NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM107434NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM067152
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The circadian rhythms of hosts dictate an approximately 24 h transformation in the environment experienced by their gut microbiome. The consequences of this cyclic environment on the intestinal microbiota are barely understood and are likely to have medical ramifications. Can daily rhythmicity in the gut act as a selective pressure that shapes the microbial community? Moreover, given that several bacterial species have been reported to exhibit circadian rhythms themselves, we test here whether a rhythmic environment is a selective pressure that favors clock-harboring bacteria that can anticipate and prepare for consistent daily changes in the environment. We observed that the daily rhythmicity of the mouse gut environment is a stabilizing influence that facilitates microbiotal recovery from antibiotic perturbation. The composition of the microbiome recovers to pretreatment conditions when exposed to consistent daily rhythmicity, whereas in hosts whose feeding and activity patterns are temporally disrupted, microbiotal recovery is incomplete and allows potentially unhealthy opportunists to exploit the temporal disarray. Unexpectedly, we found that in the absence of antibiotic perturbation, the gut microbiome is stable to rhythmic versus disrupted feeding and activity patterns. Comparison of our results with those of other studies reveals an intriguing correlation that a stable microbiome may be resilient to one perturbation alone (e.g., disruption of the daily timing of host behavior and feeding), but not to multiple perturbations in combination. However, after a perturbation of the stable microbiome, a regular daily pattern of host behavior/feeding appears to be essential for the microbiome to recover to the original steady state. Given the inconsistency of daily rhythms in modern human life (e.g., shiftwork, social jet-lag, irregular eating habits), these results emphasize the importance of consistent daily rhythmicity to optimal health not only directly to the host, but also indirectly by preserving the host's microbiome in the face of perturbations.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaCircadian RhythmHumansMiceAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID36350921
PMCPMC9645659
OpenAlexW4308653902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.