Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36350838›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

A cross-sectional study on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on psychological outcomes: Multiple indicators and multiple causes modeling.

Musheer A Aljaberi, Naser A Alareqe, Abdulsamad Alsalahi, Mousa A Qasem, Sarah Noman, Md Uzir Hossain Uzir, Lubna Ali Mohammed, Zine El Abiddine Fares, Chung-Ying Lin, Atiyeh M Abdallah and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.

Musheer A AljaberiFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Taiz University, Taiz, Yemen.ORCID 0000-0001-6533-7868
Naser A AlareqeDepartment of Educational Psychology, Faculty of Education, Taiz University, Taiz, Yemen.
Abdulsamad AlsalahiDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Sana'a University, Sana'a, Yemen.
Mousa A QasemDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-3189-5885
Sarah NomanDepartment of Community Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia.
Md Uzir Hossain UzirFaculty of Business Economics and Social Development, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, Kuala Terengganu, Terengganu, Malaysia.
Lubna Ali MohammedFaculty of Social Science, Arts, and Humanities, Lincoln University College, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia.
Zine El Abiddine FaresPsychological and Educational Research Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Djillali Liabes, Sidi Bel Abbes, Algeria.
Chung-Ying LinInstitute of Allied Health Sciences, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-2129-4242
Atiyeh M AbdallahDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, QU-Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Rukman Awang HamatDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-6288-3791
Mohd Dzulkhairi Mohd RaniDepartment of Primary Health Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, Nilai, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-1915-4862
Universiti Putra Malaysia · MYLincoln University College · MYNational Cheng Kung University · TWQatar University · QASana'a University · YETaiz University · YEUniversité Djilali de Sidi Bel Abbès · DZUniversiti Malaysia Terengganu · MYUniversiti Sains Islam Malaysia · MYUniversity of Malaya · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the psychological impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been evaluated in the literature, further research is needed, particularly on post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and psychological outcomes, is needed. This study aims to investigate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on psychological outcomes (depression, anxiety, and insomnia). A cross-sectional study using an online survey was conducted using the following instruments: Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7), and Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), structural equation model (SEM), multiple indicators and multiple causes (MIMIC) modeling, and differential item functioning (DIF) were performed to analyze the collected data. According to the results, participants with PTSD (n = 360) showed a higher level of depression, anxiety, and insomnia than those without PTSD (n = 639). Among the participants, 36.5% experienced moderate to severe symptoms of depression, and 32.6% had mild depressive symptoms. Moreover, 23.7% of participants experienced moderate to severe anxiety symptoms, and 33.1% had mild anxiety symptoms. In addition, 51.5% of participants experienced symptoms of insomnia. In conclusion, the PTSD caused by COVID-19 is significantly associated with depression, anxiety, and insomnia at the level of latent constructs and observed variables.

Indexed as

COVID-19Sleep Initiation and Maintenance DisordersAnxietyCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID36350838
PMCPMC9645638
OpenAlexW4308623141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.