Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36350805›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Modeling optimal reopening strategies for COVID-19 and its variants by keeping infections low and fixing testing capacity.

Mackenzie Dalton, Paul Dougall, Frederick Laud Amoah Darko, William Annan, Emmanuel Asante-Asamani, Susan Bailey, James Greene, Diana White

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mackenzie DaltonMathematics Department, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY, United States of America.
Paul DougallMathematics Department, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5841-4789
Frederick Laud Amoah DarkoMathematics Department, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY, United States of America.
William AnnanMathematics Department, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY, United States of America.
Emmanuel Asante-AsamaniMathematics Department, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4710-8006
Susan BaileyBiology Department, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY, United States of America.
James GreeneMathematics Department, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY, United States of America.
Diana WhiteMathematics Department, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9780-7705

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since early March 2020, government agencies have utilized a wide variety of non-pharmaceutical interventions to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 and have struggled to determine when it is appropriate to return to in-person activities after an outbreak is detected. At many universities, fundamental issues related to understanding the spread of the disease (e.g. the transmission rate), the ability of administrators to respond quickly enough by closing when there is a sudden rise in cases, and how to make a decision on when to reopen remains a concern. Surveillance testing strategies have been implemented in some places, and those test outcomes have dictated whether to reopen, to simultaneously monitor community spread, and/or to isolate discovered cases. However, the question remains as to when it is safe to reopen and how much testing is required to remain safely open while keeping infection numbers low. Here, we propose an extension of the classic SIR model to investigate reopening strategies for a fixed testing strategy, based on feedback from testing results. Specifically, we close when a predefined proportion of the population becomes infected, and later reopen when that infected proportion decreases below a predefined threshold. A valuable outcome of our approach is that our reopening strategies are robust to variation in almost all model parameters, including transmission rates, which can be extremely difficult to determine as they typically differ between variants, location, vaccination status, etc. Thus, these strategies can be, in theory, translated over to new variants in different regions of the world. Examples of robust feedback strategies for high disease transmission and a fixed testing capacity include (1) a single long lock down followed by a single long in-person period, and (2) multiple shorter lock downs followed by multiple shorter in-person periods. The utility of this approach of having multiple strategies is that administrators of universities, schools, business, etc. can use a strategy that is best adapted for their own functionality.

Indexed as

COVID-19Communicable Disease ControlDisease OutbreaksHumansSchoolsUniversities

Identifiers

PMID36350805
PMCPMC9645599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.