ArticleBlood advances2023
Creating an automated contemporaneous cohort in sickle cell anemia to predict survival after disease-modifying therapy.
Article in Blood advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Incremental eligibility criteria for the BMT CTN 1507 haploidentical trial for children with sickle cell disease.Blood advances · 2024Trial
- Article
- Accurate identification of sickle cell disease cases in a large genotyped cohort using electronic health record data.Blood advances · 2026Article
- KDIGO-defined kidney dysfunction predicts long-term outcomes in a multicenter cohort of adults with sickle cell disease.Blood advances · 2025Article
- Adhesion molecules in focus: mechanistic pathways and therapeutic avenues in sickle cell vaso-occlusion - a narrative review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
- Construction of a digital twin of chronic graft vs. host disease patients with standard of care.Bone marrow transplantation · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The Food and Drug Administration requires contemporaneous controls to compare clinical outcomes for participants receiving experimental gene therapy or gene editing clinical trials. However, developing a contemporaneous cohort of rare diseases requires multiple person-hours. In a single referral center for sickle cell disease, we tested the hypothesis that we could create an automated contemporaneous cohort of children and adults with sickle cell anemia (SCA) to predict mortality. Data were obtained between 1 January 2004 and 30 April 2021. We identified 419 individuals with SCA with consistent medical care defined as followed continuously for >0.5 years with no visit gaps >3.0 years. The median age was 10.2 years (IQR, 1-24 years), with a median follow-up of 7.4 years (IQR, 3.6-13.5 years) and 47 deaths. A total of 98% (274 of 277) of the children remained alive at 18 years of age, and 34.3% (94 of 274) of those children were followed into adulthood. For adults, the median age of survival was 49.3 years. Treatment groups were mutually exclusive and in a hierarchical order: hematopoietic stem cell transplant (n = 22)>regular blood transfusion for at least 2 years (n = 56)>hydroxyurea for at least 1 year (n = 243)>no disease-modifying therapy (n = 98). Compared to those receiving no disease-modifying treatment, those treated with hydroxyurea therapy had a significantly lower hazard of mortality (hazard ratio = 0.38; P = 0.016), but no statistical difference for those receiving regular blood transfusions compared to no disease-modifying therapy (hazard ratio = 0.71; P = 0.440). An automated contemporaneous SCA cohort can be generated to estimate mortality in children and adults with SCA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.