Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36350705›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2022

A Transfer Learning Approach to Correct the Temporal Performance Drift of Clinical Prediction Models: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Xiangzhou Zhang, Yunfei Xue, Xinyu Su, Shaoyong Chen, Kang Liu, Weiqi Chen, Mei Liu, Yong Hu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Machine Learning Operations in Health Care: A Scoping Review.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xiangzhou Zhang *Big Data Decision Institute, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3752-0045
Yunfei Xue *Big Data Decision Institute, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6871-8228
Xinyu Su *Big Data Decision Institute, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7689-1952
Shaoyong ChenBig Data Decision Institute, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9691-9905
Kang LiuBig Data Decision Institute, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9270-1362
Weiqi ChenBig Data Decision Institute, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6550-5024
Mei LiuDivision of Medical Informatics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8036-2110
Yong HuBig Data Decision Institute, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3837-1750

Funding

RADx-UP: Improving the Response of Local Urban and Rural Communities to Disparities in Covid-19 TestingUL1TR002366 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI Mario Castro, JAMES STEVEN LEEDER · 2017 to 2026
$44.3M
Identifying Personalized Risk of Acute Kidney Injury with Machine LearningR01DK116986 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI LIU, MEI · 2019 to 2021
$1.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002366NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK116986
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical prediction models suffer from performance drift as the patient population shifts over time. There is a great need for model updating approaches or modeling frameworks that can effectively use the old and new data.

objectiveBased on the paradigm of transfer learning, we aimed to develop a novel modeling framework that transfers old knowledge to the new environment for prediction tasks, and contributes to performance drift correction.

methodsThe proposed predictive modeling framework maintains a logistic regression-based stacking ensemble of 2 gradient boosting machine (GBM) models representing old and new knowledge learned from old and new data, respectively (referred to as transfer learning gradient boosting machine [TransferGBM]). The ensemble learning procedure can dynamically balance the old and new knowledge. Using 2010-2017 electronic health record data on a retrospective cohort of 141,696 patients, we validated TransferGBM for hospital-acquired acute kidney injury prediction.

resultsThe baseline models (ie, transported models) that were trained on 2010 and 2011 data showed significant performance drift in the temporal validation with 2012-2017 data. Refitting these models using updated samples resulted in performance gains in nearly all cases. The proposed TransferGBM model succeeded in achieving uniformly better performance than the refitted models.

conclusionsUnder the scenario of population shift, incorporating new knowledge while preserving old knowledge is essential for maintaining stable performance. Transfer learning combined with stacking ensemble learning can help achieve a balance of old and new knowledge in a flexible and adaptive way, even in the case of insufficient new data.

Indexed as

acute kidney injuryclinical prediction modelconcept driftperformance drifttransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID36350705
PMCPMC9685506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.