ArticleJMIR medical informatics2022
A Transfer Learning Approach to Correct the Temporal Performance Drift of Clinical Prediction Models: Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in the prediction of venous thromboembolism: A systematic review and pooled analysis.European journal of haematology · 2023Pooled it
- Beyond Regulatory Approval: Lifecycle Assurance for Clinical Artificial Intelligence.Journal of medical systems · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in nephrology: predicting CKD progression and personalizing treatment.International urology and nephrology · 2026Review
- Fair and robust early readmission risk prediction from electronic health records via diffusion-based data augmentation and causal-invariant representation learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Continuous assurance for AI-driven clinical decision support systems.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Review
- Large Language Models for Real-World Nutrition Assessment: Structured Prompts, Multi-Model Validation and Expert Oversight.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Bridging Data Gaps in Healthcare: A Scoping Review of Transfer Learning in Structured Data Analysis.Health data science · 2025Review
- Development and Validation of a Machine Learning-Based Early Warning Model for Lichenoid Vulvar Disease: Prediction Model Development Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Comparative Effectiveness of Health Communication Strategies in Nursing: A Mixed Methods Study of Internet, mHealth, and Social Media Versus Traditional Methods.JMIR nursing · 2024Article
- Machine Learning Operations in Health Care: A Scoping Review.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2024Review
- Consolidated Reporting Guidelines for Prognostic and Diagnostic Machine Learning Models (CREMLS).Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Comprehensive Overview of Computational Modeling and Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Neurosurgery.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundClinical prediction models suffer from performance drift as the patient population shifts over time. There is a great need for model updating approaches or modeling frameworks that can effectively use the old and new data.
objectiveBased on the paradigm of transfer learning, we aimed to develop a novel modeling framework that transfers old knowledge to the new environment for prediction tasks, and contributes to performance drift correction.
methodsThe proposed predictive modeling framework maintains a logistic regression-based stacking ensemble of 2 gradient boosting machine (GBM) models representing old and new knowledge learned from old and new data, respectively (referred to as transfer learning gradient boosting machine [TransferGBM]). The ensemble learning procedure can dynamically balance the old and new knowledge. Using 2010-2017 electronic health record data on a retrospective cohort of 141,696 patients, we validated TransferGBM for hospital-acquired acute kidney injury prediction.
resultsThe baseline models (ie, transported models) that were trained on 2010 and 2011 data showed significant performance drift in the temporal validation with 2012-2017 data. Refitting these models using updated samples resulted in performance gains in nearly all cases. The proposed TransferGBM model succeeded in achieving uniformly better performance than the refitted models.
conclusionsUnder the scenario of population shift, incorporating new knowledge while preserving old knowledge is essential for maintaining stable performance. Transfer learning combined with stacking ensemble learning can help achieve a balance of old and new knowledge in a flexible and adaptive way, even in the case of insufficient new data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.