ArticleJAMA cardiology2023
Results of a Remotely Delivered Hypertension and Lipid Program in More Than 10 000 Patients Across a Diverse Health Care Network.
Article in JAMA cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 59 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
59 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence-enhanced management system for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease: a randomized clinical trial.BMC medicine · 2026Trial
- Patient Perceptions of a Digitally Enabled Community Health Worker Intervention: Qualitative Study Among Pilot Trial Participants.JMIR cardio · 2026Trial
- Rationale and Design of the Cooperative Program for ImpLementation of Optimal Therapy in Heart Failure.Clinical cardiology · 2026Trial
- Home-Based Care for Hypertension in Rural South Africa.The New England journal of medicine · 2025Trial
- Mobile Health Intervention in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2023Trial
- Statins Use in Veterans With Peripheral Artery Disease: Insights From the PEARLS Study.Circulation. Population health and outcomes · 2026Article
- Impact of a Telehealth Navigator Intervention on Hypertension Control Among Black Patients Served by Federally Qualified Health Centers.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Observational
- Physician Perceptions, Knowledge, and Implementation of Lipid-Lowering Guidelines in the USA.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- A Remote Program for Navigator- and Pharmacist-Led Management of Obesity Medications in Adults: Rationale, Design, and Implementation.Obesity science & practice · 2026Article
- Creating change through short-term pilots and rapid cycle testing: a case of cardiovascular risk reduction.BMJ open quality · 2026Article
- Impact of a mobile health education program on blood pressure and lipid profiles: a cohort study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- ANMCO position paper E-health integration in cardiology clinical care framework.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026Article
- Implementation of a Self-Measured Blood Pressure Pilot Program in an Academic Internal Medicine Practice.American journal of hypertension · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Real-World Patient Engagement in a Remote Patient Monitoring for Hypertension Program.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- The practice of family pharmacists in managing polypharmacy for home-based elderly patients.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2026Article
- Remote Blood Pressure Monitoring: A Comprehensive Review.American journal of hypertension · 2026Review
- Optimizing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) management - a US physician survey of barriers and burdens.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
- Access to digital health technologies: personalized framework and global perspectives.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2026Review
- Outcomes of Team-Based Digital Monitoring of Patients With Multiple Chronic Conditions: Semiparametric Event Study.JMIR cardio · 2025Article
- Reimagining Arterial Hypertension and Dyslipidemia Care: Telemedicine's Promise and Pitfalls from the Slovak Patient Viewpoint.Clinics and practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Blood pressure (BP) and cholesterol control remain challenging. Remote care can deliver more effective care outside of traditional clinician-patient settings but scaling and ensuring access to care among diverse populations remains elusive. Objective: To implement and evaluate a remote hypertension and cholesterol management program across a diverse health care network. Design, Setting, and Participants: Between January 2018 and July 2021, 20 454 patients in a large integrated health network were screened; 18 444 were approached, and 10 803 were enrolled in a comprehensive remote hypertension and cholesterol program (3658 patients with hypertension, 8103 patients with cholesterol, and 958 patients with both). A total of 1266 patients requested education only without medication titration. Enrolled patients received education, home BP device integration, and medication titration. Nonlicensed navigators and pharmacists, supported by cardiovascular clinicians, coordinated care using standardized algorithms, task management and automation software, and omnichannel communication. BP and laboratory test results were actively monitored. Main Outcomes and Measures: Changes in BP and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Results: The mean (SD) age among 10 803 patients was 65 (11.4) years; 6009 participants (56%) were female; 1321 (12%) identified as Black, 1190 (11%) as Hispanic, 7758 (72%) as White, and 1727 (16%) as another or multiple races (including American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, unknown, other, and declined to respond; consolidated owing to small numbers); and 142 (11%) reported a preferred language other than English. A total of 424 482 BP readings and 139 263 laboratory reports were collected. In the hypertension program, the mean (SD) office BP prior to enrollment was 150/83 (18/10) mm Hg, and the mean (SD) home BP was 145/83 (20/12) mm Hg. For those engaged in remote medication management, the mean (SD) clinic BP 6 and 12 months after enrollment decreased by 8.7/3.8 (21.4/12.4) and 9.7/5.2 (22.2/12.6) mm Hg, respectively. In the education-only cohort, BP changed by a mean (SD) -1.5/-0.7 (23.0/11.1) and by +0.2/-1.9 (30.3/11.2) mm Hg, respectively (P < .001 for between cohort difference). In the lipids program, patients in remote medication management experienced a reduction in LDL-C by a mean (SD) 35.4 (43.1) and 37.5 (43.9) mg/dL at 6 and 12 months, respectively, while the education-only cohort experienced a mean (SD) reduction in LDL-C of 9.3 (34.3) and 10.2 (35.5) mg/dL at 6 and 12 months, respectively (P < .001). Similar rates of enrollment and reductions in BP and lipids were observed across different racial, ethnic, and primary language groups. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this study indicate that a standardized remote BP and cholesterol management program may help optimize guideline-directed therapy at scale, reduce cardiovascular risk, and minimize the need for in-person visits among diverse populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.