Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36350568›Full record

ArticleHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2023

The human embryonic genome is karyotypically complex, with chromosomally abnormal cells preferentially located away from the developing fetus.

D K Griffin, P R Brezina, K Tobler, Yulian Zhao, G Silvestri, R C Mccoy, R Anchan, A Benner, G R Cutting, W G Kearns

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
13.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

D K GriffinSchool of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7595-3226
P R BrezinaJones Division of Reproductive Endocrinology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
K ToblerJones Division of Reproductive Endocrinology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Yulian ZhaoJones Division of Reproductive Endocrinology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
G SilvestriSchool of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5496-2470
R C MccoyDepartment of Biology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0615-146X
R AnchanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
A BennerAdvaGenix, Rockville, MD, USA.
G R CuttingDepartment of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
W G KearnsJones Division of Reproductive Endocrinology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Kent · GBHarvard University · US

Funding

Function and fitness consequences of human genetic variationR35GM133747 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Rajiv Champion McCoy · 2019 to 2026
$3.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM133747
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionAre chromosome abnormalities detected at Day 3 post-fertilization predominantly retained in structures of the blastocyst other than the inner cell mass (ICM), where chromosomally normal cells are preferentially retained? SUMMARY ANSWER: In human embryos, aneuploid cells are sequestered away from the ICM, partly to the trophectoderm (TE) but more significantly to the blastocoel fluid within the blastocoel cavity (Bc) and to peripheral cells (PCs) surrounding the blastocyst during Day 3 to Day 5 progression. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: A commonly held dogma in all diploid eukaryotes is that two gametes, each with 'n' chromosomes (23 in humans), fuse to form a '2n' zygote (46 in humans); a state that remains in perpetuity for all somatic cell divisions. Human embryos, however, display high levels of chromosomal aneuploidy in early stages that reportedly declines from Day 3 (cleavage stage) to Day 5 (blastocyst) post-fertilization. While this observation may be partly because of aneuploid embryonic arrest before blastulation, it could also be due to embryo 'normalization' to a euploid state during blastulation. If and how this normalization occurs requires further investigation. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A total of 964 cleavage-stage (Day 3) embryos underwent single-cell biopsy and diagnosis for chromosome constitution. All were maintained in culture, assessing blastulation rate, both for those assessed euploid and aneuploid. Pregnancy rate was assessed for those determined euploid, blastulated and subsequently transferred. For those determined aneuploid and blastulated (174 embryos), ICM (all 174 embryos), TE (all 174), Bc (47 embryos) and PC (38 embryos) were analyzed for chromosome constitution. Specifically, concordance with the original Day 3 diagnosis and determination if any 'normalized' to euploid karyotypes within all four structures was assessed. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,

methodsAll patients (144 couples) were undergoing routine preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in three IVF clinical settings. Cleavage-stage biopsy preceded chromosome analysis by next-generation sequencing. All patients provided informed consent. Additional molecular testing was carried out on blastocyst embryos and was analyzed for up to four embryonic structures (ICM, TE, Bc and PC). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Of 463/964 embryos (48%) diagnosed as euploid at Day 3, 70% blastulated (leading to a 59% pregnancy rate) and 30% degenerated. Conversely, of the 501 (52%) diagnosed as aneuploid, 65% degenerated and 35% (174) blastulated, a highly significant difference (P < 0.0001). Of the 174 that blastulated, the ratio of '(semi)concordant-aneuploid' versus 'normalized-euploid' versus 'other-aneuploid' embryos was, respectively, 39%/57%/3% in the ICM; 49%/48%/3% in the TE; 78%/21%/0% in the PC; and 83%/10%/5% in the Bc. The TE karyotype therefore has a positive predictive value of 86.7% in determining that of the ICM, albeit with marginally higher aneuploid rates of abnormalities (P = .071). Levels of abnormality in Bc/PC were significantly higher (P < 0.0001) versus the ploidy of the ICM and TE and nearly all chromosome abnormalities were (at least partially) concordant with Day 3 diagnoses. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The results only pertain to human IVF embryos so extrapolation to the in vivo situation and to other species is not certain. We acknowledge (rather than lineage-specific survival, as we suggest here) the possibility of other mechanisms, such as lineage-specific movement of cells, during blastulation. Ethical considerations, however, make investigating this mechanism difficult on human embryos. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsMosaic human cleavage-stage embryos can differentiate into a euploid ICM where euploid cell populations predominate. Sequestering of aneuploid cells/nuclei to structures no longer involved in fetal development has important implications for preimplantation and prenatal genetic testing. These results also challenge previous fundamental understandings of mitotic fidelity in early human development and indicate a complex and fluid nature of the human embryonic genome. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This research was funded by Organon Pharmaceuticals and Merck Serono by grants to W.G.K. W.G.K. is also an employee of AdvaGenix, who could, potentially, indirectly benefit financially from publication of this manuscript. R.C.M. is supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under award number R35GM133747. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. D.K.G. provides paid consultancy services for Care Fertility. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: : N/A.

Indexed as

Preimplantation DiagnosisAneuploidyBlastocystChromosome AberrationsFemaleFetusHumansKaryotypePregnancyaneuploidyembryo correctionembryo normalizationIVFmosaicmosaicismPGTPGT-Apreimplantation embryopreimplantation genetic testing

Identifiers

PMID36350568
PMCPMC10089293
OpenAlexW4308616678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.