ArticleJournal of nephrology2022
Role of detached podocytes in differentiating between minimal change disease and early focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, can we rely on routine light microscopy?
Article in Journal of nephrology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular mechanisms in podocytopathies: finding suitable targets for a new era of glomerular gene therapy.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Review
- Assessment of podocyte detachment as a pivotal step in the development of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2024Article
- PD-1 immunology in the kidneys: a growing relationship.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Therapeutic Potential Targeting Podocyte Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis.Kidney diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Development and validation of a simple-to-use nomogram for predicting minimal change disease based on quantification of color Doppler sonography data from a region of interest.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDetachment of podocytes represents a turning point in the development of glomerular sclerosis and consequently, of CKD progression. Furthermore, detachment may differentiate minimal change disease (MCD) cases-which have only podocyte effacement-from early focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) in which effacement and detachment are observed by electron microscopy. Noteworthy, it is not uncommon for early FSGS to present with clinical presentation and light microscopy (LM) pictures identical to MCD. In our routine practice, we often find cells that lie freely in Bowman's space by LM. In this study, we try to determine whether these cells are detached podocytes that are worth reporting or just an artifact that can be ignored.
methodsTo the best of our knowledge, no study has discussed the accuracy of LM in detecting detached podocytes by the routinely used stains. We retrospectively selected 118 cases that were diagnosed as MCD by LM, and searched for detached cells in Bowman's space in their archived, routinely stained LM slides. After that, we tried to find any correlation between the clinical course, detached cells in LM picture and the EM reports.
resultsLM can significantly detect detached podocytes with a positive predictive value of 93%, specificity of 85%, and sensitivity of 46%. Significant correlations were found between detached cells and degree of proteinuria and late steroid resistance.
conclusionDetecting detached podocytes by LM is a specific finding that must be reported whenever detected, as it predicts response to steroids and may be able to differentiate MCD from early FSGS by identifying patients who could have podocytopenia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.