ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2023
Bioinformatical Approaches to the Discovery and Classification of Novel Deubiquitinases.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs) are active at multiple levels of the eukaryotic ubiquitin system. DUBs are important for ubiquitin activation and maintaining cellular ubiquitin levels but can also edit or dissolve ubiquitin chains or deconjugate ubiquitin from substrates. Eukaryotic DUBs can be grouped into seven molecular classes, most of which enzymes are cysteine proteases assuming the papain fold. In recent years, an ever-increasing number of pathogen-encoded DUBs have been characterized, which are active inside the host cell and help the pathogens to evade the defense response. At first sight, bacterial and viral DUBs appear to be very different from their eukaryotic counterparts, making them hard to identify by bioinformatic methods. However, apart from very few exceptions, bacterial and viral DUBs are distantly related to eukaryotic DUB classes and possess several hallmarks that can be used to identify high-confidence DUB candidates from pathogen genomes - even in the complete absence of biochemical or functional annotation. This chapter addresses bioinformatical DUB discovery approaches based on a previously published analysis of DUB evolution. The core set of bioinformatical tools required for this endeavor are freely accessible and do not require a particular bioinformatics infrastructure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.