Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36350497›Full record

ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2023

In pursuit of inter-specialty consensus on excited delirium syndrome: a scoping literature review.

Sarah Slocum, Matthew Fiorillo, Eric Harding, Julie Owen, Ruby Long, Thom Dunn, Ian Martin

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. ACMT Position Statement: End the Use of the Term "Excited Delirium".Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sarah SlocumDepartment of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH, USA. Sarah.E.Slocum@hitchcock.org.
Matthew FiorilloDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Eric HardingMedical College of Wisconsin Libraries, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Julie OwenDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Ruby LongDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Thom DunnPsychological Sciences, University of Northern Colorado and Behavioral Health Service, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA.
Ian MartinDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Excited delirium syndrome (ExDS) is a controversial and disputed diagnosis involving altered mentation, agitation, and, frequently, substance abuse. Recently, it has become a common pre-hospital diagnosis, serving as justification for use of force, restraint, and/or medication administration. To conduct a scoping review across three databases to describe the most frequently reported diagnostic criteria for ExDS, as well as to explore its use as a diagnosis for deaths of individuals in the custody of law enforcement. In 2021, three literature databases were searched: Ovid Medline, PsycInfo, and Scopus. Studies were included if they were peer-reviewed, English articles describing (1) ExDS symptoms, (2) substance intoxication with at least 2 ExDS symptoms present, or (3) centering on deaths occurring in the custody of law enforcement and attributed to ExDS. Key study data were extracted and the current literature was described qualitatively. Analysis took place between March and December 2021. A total of 97 studies were identified through initial abstract and secondary full-text review, with noted discrepancies in the definition of ExDS itself. After review, differences in ExDS diagnosis among organizations were explored, along with subsequent clinical impact, particularly in the pre-hospital setting. Resulting impact on patients, particularly those of minoritized ethnic and racial groups, was also noted. Prone aggressive restraint, in particular, is noted as an established risk factor for fatalities in ExDS cases. At this time, ExDS should not be utilized as a diagnosis; major medical organizations have an urgent responsibility to convene to formalize consensus-based diagnostic criteria or to propose alternate management guidelines for agitated and altered persons.

Indexed as

DeliriumPoliceConsensusConsensus Statements as TopicHumansLaw EnforcementRisk FactorsAgitationExcited catatoniaExcited deliriumRestraint-related deaths

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.