ArticleAdvances in health sciences education : theory and practice2022
Combining adaptive expertise and (critically) reflective practice to support the development of knowledge, skill, and society.
Article in Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the reflective practice training needs of Master of Nursing Specialist students: a qualitative study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Transforming Clinical Education While Addressing System Gaps: Student Leadership Experiences (SLEs).Perspectives on medical education · 2026Article
- The Knowledge We Hold: Exploring Occupational Therapy's Epistemic Identity and the Balance Between Evidence and Practice.Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie · 2025Article
- Deployment of professional expertise during a period of disruption: A phenomenological study of rehabilitation clinicians.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2025Article
- Exploring the Multidimensional Advantages of Productive Failure in Cultivating Clinical Thinking, Collaboration, Stress Management, and Learning Retention in Resident Physicians.Advances in medical education and practice · 2025Review
- Review
- Expertise in Coach Development: The Need for Clarity.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Reimagining global mental health in Africa.BMJ global health · 2023Review
- Article
- Adaptive Expertise in Undergraduate Pharmacy Education.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Risk Factors for the Mental Health of Adolescents from the Parental Perspective: Photo-Voice in Rural Communities of Ecuador.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Effectiveness of multi-professional educational interventions to train Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) - a Systematic Review.International journal of integrated careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adaptive expertise (AE) and reflective practice (RP), two influential and resonant theories of professional expertise and practice in their own right, may further benefit health professions education if carefully combined. The current societal and systemic context is primed for both AE and RP. Both bodies of work position practitioners as agentive, learning continually and thoughtfully throughout their careers, particularly in order to manage unprecedented situations well. Similar on the surface, the roots and practices of AE and RP diverge at key junctures and we will focus on RP's movement toward critically reflective practice. The roots of AE and RP, and how they relate to or diverge from present-day applications matter because in health professions education, as in all education, paradigmatic mixing should be undertaken purposefully. This paper will explore the need for AE and RP, their shared commitments, distinctive histories, pedagogical possibilities both individually and combined, and next steps for maximizing their potential to positively impact the field. We argue that this exploration is urgently needed because both AE and RP hold much promise for improving health care and yet employing them optimally-whether alone or together-requires understanding and intent. We build an interprofessional education case situated in long-term care, throughout the paper, to demonstrate the potential that AE and RP might offer to health professions education individually and combined. This exploration comes just in time. Within the realities of uncertain practice emphasized by the pandemic, practitioners were also called to act in response to complex and urgent social movements. A combined AE and RP approach, with focus on critically reflective practice in particular, would potentially prepare professionals to respond effectively, compassionately, and equitably to future health and social crises and challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.