Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36350488›Full record

ArticleAdvances in health sciences education : theory and practice2022

Combining adaptive expertise and (critically) reflective practice to support the development of knowledge, skill, and society.

Stella L Ng, Jacquelin Forsey, Victoria A Boyd, Farah Friesen, Sylvia Langlois, Kori Ladonna, Maria Mylopoulos, Naomi Steenhof

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Knowledge We Hold: Exploring Occupational Therapy's Epistemic Identity and the Balance Between Evidence and Practice.Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Expertise in Coach Development: The Need for Clarity.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Adaptive Expertise in Undergraduate Pharmacy Education.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stella L NgCentre for Advancing Collaborative Healthcare and Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. stella.ng@utoronto.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-1433-6851
Jacquelin ForseyRehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Victoria A BoydInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Farah FriesenCentre for Advancing Collaborative Healthcare and Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Sylvia LangloisTemerty Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Canada.
Kori LadonnaDepartment of Innovation in Medical Education, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Maria MylopoulosThe Wilson Centre, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Naomi SteenhofLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adaptive expertise (AE) and reflective practice (RP), two influential and resonant theories of professional expertise and practice in their own right, may further benefit health professions education if carefully combined. The current societal and systemic context is primed for both AE and RP. Both bodies of work position practitioners as agentive, learning continually and thoughtfully throughout their careers, particularly in order to manage unprecedented situations well. Similar on the surface, the roots and practices of AE and RP diverge at key junctures and we will focus on RP's movement toward critically reflective practice. The roots of AE and RP, and how they relate to or diverge from present-day applications matter because in health professions education, as in all education, paradigmatic mixing should be undertaken purposefully. This paper will explore the need for AE and RP, their shared commitments, distinctive histories, pedagogical possibilities both individually and combined, and next steps for maximizing their potential to positively impact the field. We argue that this exploration is urgently needed because both AE and RP hold much promise for improving health care and yet employing them optimally-whether alone or together-requires understanding and intent. We build an interprofessional education case situated in long-term care, throughout the paper, to demonstrate the potential that AE and RP might offer to health professions education individually and combined. This exploration comes just in time. Within the realities of uncertain practice emphasized by the pandemic, practitioners were also called to act in response to complex and urgent social movements. A combined AE and RP approach, with focus on critically reflective practice in particular, would potentially prepare professionals to respond effectively, compassionately, and equitably to future health and social crises and challenges.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceLearningDelivery of Health CareHumansKnowledgeAdaptive expertiseCritical reflectionInterprofessionalPedagogyReflective practice

Identifiers

PMID36350488
PMCPMC9645329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.