Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36350384›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2022

Identifying urethral strictures using machine learning: a proof-of-concept evaluation of convolutional neural network model.

Jin Kyu Kim, Kurt McCammon, Catherine Robey, Marvin Castillo, Odina Gomez, Patricia Jarmin L Pua, Francis Pile, Manuel See, Mandy Rickard, Armando J Lorenzo and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jin Kyu KimDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. jjk.kim@mail.utoronto.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0964-9503
Kurt McCammonDepartment of Urology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA.
Catherine RobeyDepartment of Urology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA.
Marvin CastilloInstitute of Urology, St. Luke's Medical Centre, Quezon City, Philippines.
Odina GomezSection of Pediatric Imaging, Institute of Radiology, St. Luke's Medical Centre, Quezon City, Philippines.
Patricia Jarmin L PuaSection of Pediatric Imaging, Institute of Radiology, St. Luke's Medical Centre, Quezon City, Philippines.
Francis PileInstitute of Urology, St. Luke's Medical Centre, Quezon City, Philippines.
Manuel SeeInstitute of Urology, St. Luke's Medical Centre, Quezon City, Philippines.
Mandy RickardDivision of Urology, Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0598-1824
Armando J LorenzoDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6735-9462
Michael E ChuaDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4388-4067

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo evaluate urethral strictures and to determine appropriate surgical reconstructive options, retrograde urethrograms (RUG) are used. Herein, we develop a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based machine learning algorithm to characterize RUG images between those with urethral strictures and those without urethral strictures.

methodsFollowing approval from institutional REB from participating institutions (The Hospital for Sick Children [Toronto, Canada], St. Luke's Medical Centre [Quezon City, Philippines], East Virginia Medical School [Norfolk, United States of America]), retrograde urethrogram images were collected and anonymized. Additional RUG images were downloaded online using web scraping method through Selenium and Python 3.8.2. A CNN with three convolutional layers and three pooling layers were built (Fig. 1). Data augmentation was applied with zoom, contrast, horizontal flip, and translation. The data were split into 90% training and 10% testing set. The model was trained with one hundred epochs.

resultsA total of 242 RUG images were identified. 196 were identified as strictures and 46 as normal. Following training, our model achieved accuracy of up to 92.2% with its training data set in characterizing RUG images to stricture and normal images. The validation accuracy using our testing set images showed that it was able to characterize 88.5% of the images correctly.

conclusionIt is feasible to use a machine learning algorithm to accurately differentiate between a stricture and normal RUG. Further development of the model with additional RUGs may allow characterization of stricture location and length to suggest optimal operative approach for repair.

Indexed as

Urethral StrictureChildConstriction, PathologicCystographyHumansMachine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerClassificationIdentificationMachine learningRetrograde urethrogramUrethral stricture

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.