Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36350354›Full record

Trial reportIntensive care medicine2022

Model-informed precision dosing of beta-lactam antibiotics and ciprofloxacin in critically ill patients: a multicentre randomised clinical trial.

Tim M J Ewoldt, Alan Abdulla, Wim J R Rietdijk, Anouk E Muller, Brenda C M de Winter, Nicole G M Hunfeld, Ilse M Purmer, Peter van Vliet, Evert-Jan Wils, Jasper Haringman and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Intensive care medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
16.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Therapeutic drug monitoring of high-dosage intravenous flucloxacillin and mortality in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a retrospective cohort study using inverse probability weighting.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Uncertainty undermines the validity of antimicrobial pharmacodynamics.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Review

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Tim M J Ewoldt *Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. t.ewoldt@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2918-2210
Alan Abdulla *Department Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Wim J R RietdijkDepartment Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Anouk E MullerRotterdam Clinical Pharmacometrics Group, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Brenda C M de WinterDepartment Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Nicole G M HunfeldDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ilse M PurmerDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Haga Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Peter van VlietDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Evert-Jan WilsDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jasper HaringmanDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Annelies DraismaDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Groene Hart Hospital, Gouda, The Netherlands.
Tom A RijpstraDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands.
Attila KarakusDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Diederik GommersDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Henrik EndemanDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Birgit C P KochDepartment Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLAmphia Ziekenhuis · NLDiakonessenhuis hospital · NLGroene Hart Ziekenhuis · NLHaga Hospital · NLIsala · NLMedisch Centrum Haaglanden · NL

Funding

Erasmus Universitair Medisch Centrum Rotterdam MRaceZonMw 848017008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIndividualising drug dosing using model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) of beta-lactam antibiotics and ciprofloxacin has been proposed as an alternative to standard dosing to optimise antibiotic efficacy in critically ill patients. However, randomised clinical trials (RCT) on clinical outcomes have been lacking.

methodsThis multicentre RCT, including patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) who were treated with antibiotics, was conducted in eight hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients were randomised to MIPD with dose and interval adjustments based on monitoring serum drug levels (therapeutic drug monitoring) combined with pharmacometric modelling of beta-lactam antibiotics and ciprofloxacin. The primary outcome was ICU length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes were ICU mortality, hospital mortality, 28-day mortality, 6-month mortality, delta sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, adverse events and target attainment.

resultsIn total, 388 (MIPD n = 189; standard dosing n = 199) patients were analysed (median age 64 [IQR 55-71]). We found no significant differences in ICU LOS between MIPD compared to standard dosing (10 MIPD vs 8 standard dosing; IRR = 1.16; 95% CI 0.96-1.41; p = 0.13). There was no significant difference in target attainment before intervention at day 1 (T1) (55.6% MIPD vs 60.9% standard dosing; p = 0.24) or at day 3 (T3) (59.5% vs 60.4%; p = 0.84). There were no significant differences in other secondary outcomes.

conclusionsWe could not show a beneficial effect of MIPD of beta-lactam antibiotics and ciprofloxacin on ICU LOS in critically ill patients. Our data highlight the need to identify other approaches to dose optimisation.

Indexed as

beta-LactamsCritical IllnessAnti-Bacterial AgentsCiprofloxacinHumansIntensive Care UnitsMiddle AgedMonobactamsAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamsCiprofloxacinMonobactamsBeta-lactam antibioticsCiprofloxacinCritically illModel-informedPrecision dosing

Identifiers

PMID36350354
PMCPMC9645317
OpenAlexW4308766976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.