ArticlePediatric cardiology2024
Association of Immediate Postoperative Hemodynamic and Laboratory Values in Predicting Norwood Admission Outcomes.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The primary objective of this study was to determine whether or not hemodynamic parameters and laboratory values at the time of admission to the pediatric cardiac intensive care unit after the Norwood operation were associated with a composite outcome of either need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or inpatient mortality. This was a single-center retrospective study of infants with functionally univentricular hearts admitted to intensive care after the Norwood procedure from January 2011 to January 2020. Data were obtained at a single point (after a Norwood procedure) and then compared between two subsets of patients based on the presence or not of the composite outcome of interest. In univariate and multiple regression analyses, a series of receiver operator curves were generated to assess the relationship between the variables of interest and the composite outcome. Eight (7.6%) experienced the composite outcome out of a total of 104 patients. Those who experienced the composite endpoint had significantly higher oxygen extraction ratio (0.43 vs. 0.31, p = 0.01), lower systemic blood flow (2.5 L/min versus 3.1 L/min, p = 0.01), and higher systemic vascular resistance (20.2 indexed woods units versus 14.8 indexed woods units, p = 0.01). Those with systemic blood flow of less than 2.5 L/min/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.