Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36350242›Full record

ArticleJBRA assisted reproduction2022

Fresh transfer of an average quality slow growing day-3 embryo versus frozen transfer in a poor responder: a clinical management dilemma.

Garima Sachdeva, R Suchindra, Arveen Vohra, R Devi

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in JBRA assisted reproduction, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Garima SachdevaMilann, The Fertility Center, New Dheli, India.
R SuchindraMilann, The Fertility Center, New Dheli, India.
Arveen VohraMilann, The Fertility Center, New Dheli, India.
R DeviMilann, The Fertility Center, New Dheli, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A common conundrum faced by clinicians is whether to go for fresh transfer or culture the embryos for future frozen transfer in a case of slow-growing embryo. This case report describes a successful pregnancy with the fresh transfer of a single day 3- 6-cell grade B embryo in a patient with poor ovarian reserve. Although more research is needed in this context, the fresh transfer can be considered as a treatment option in patients with optimal endometrium and well-controlled progesterone levels with slow-growing embryos.

Indexed as

Embryo TransferLive BirthCryopreservationEmbryo, MammalianFemaleFertilization in VitroFreezingHumansPregnancyPregnancy Rateblastocystembryoembryo transferIn vitro fertilisationpoor responder

Identifiers

PMID36350242
PMCPMC9635597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.