Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36350207›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2022

Greater variability in rhesus macaque (

Abigail E Colby, Alex R DeCasien, Eve B Cooper, James P Higham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Greater variability in rhesus macaque (Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Abigail E ColbyDepartment of Anthropology, New York University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6778-3893
Alex R DeCasienDepartment of Anthropology, New York University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6205-5408
Eve B CooperDepartment of Anthropology, New York University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3804-6285
James P HighamDepartment of Anthropology, New York University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1133-2030

Funding

Translational Science InitiativeP40OD012217 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO MED SCIENCES · PI Melween I. Martinez · 2012 to 2026
$40.4M
NIH HHS P40 OD012217
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The greater male variability (GMV) hypothesis proposes that traits are more variable among males than females, and is supported by numerous empirical studies. Interestingly, GMV is also observed for human brain size and internal brain structure, a pattern which may have implications for sex-biased neurological and psychiatric conditions. A better understanding of neuroanatomical variability in non-human primates may illuminate whether certain species are appropriate models for these conditions. Here, we tested for sex differences in the variability of endocranial volume (ECV, a proxy for brain size) in a sample of 542 rhesus macaques (

Indexed as

ReproductionSex ChromosomesAnimalsFemaleMacaca mulattaMalePhenotypeSex Characteristicsendocranial volumerhesus macaquessexual selectionvariability

Identifiers

PMID36350207
PMCPMC9653222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.