Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36350194›Full record

ArticleParasite (Paris, France)2022

Serological diagnosis of toxoplasmosis: evaluation of the commercial test recomLine Toxoplasma IgG immunoblot (Mikrogen) based on recombinant antigens.

Vincent Jean-Pierre, Julien Miozzo, Hélène Fricker-Hidalgo, Cécile Garnaud, Marie Gladys Robert, Hervé Pelloux, Marie-Pierre Brenier-Pinchart

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasite (Paris, France), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vincent Jean-PierreParasitology-Mycology, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, 38000 Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0433-0141
Julien MiozzoParasitology-Mycology, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, 38000 Grenoble, France.
Hélène Fricker-HidalgoParasitology-Mycology, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, 38000 Grenoble, France.
Cécile GarnaudParasitology-Mycology, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, 38000 Grenoble, France - TIMC, CNRS, Université Grenoble Alpes, 38000 Grenoble, France.
Marie Gladys RobertParasitology-Mycology, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, 38000 Grenoble, France.
Hervé PellouxParasitology-Mycology, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, 38000 Grenoble, France.
Marie-Pierre Brenier-PinchartParasitology-Mycology, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, 38000 Grenoble, France.
Université Grenoble Alpes · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIgG detection to determine immune status to Toxoplasma gondii infection and seroconversion mainly relies on ELISA techniques and, if necessary, on a confirmatory test, Western blot. This study evaluated the performance of the recomLine Toxoplasma IgG immunoblot (IB-recomLine) (Mikrogen) as a confirmatory test on a large number of sera. A total of 171 sera were selected (113 patients) and had previously been analyzed by two ELISA tests, ARCHITECT (Abbott) and VIDAS (bioMérieux) ± LDBIO-Toxo II IgG Western blot (WB-LDBIO) (LDBio). The sera were classified into three groups: group 1 included 50 sera without difficulty in interpreting the IgG results (patients with documented past infection or uninfected); group 2 included 47 sera with difficulty in interpreting the ELISA results; and group 3 included 74 sequential sera from 25 pregnant women with seroconversion.

resultsIn group 1, overall IgG agreements were 94% and 90% with ARCHITECT and VIDAS, respectively. In group 2, low agreement was observed between IB-recomLine and WB-LDBIO, with eight false-positive and 13 false-negative results. In group 3, 4/13 seroconversions were detected earlier with IB-recomLine compared to other tests.

conclusionsIB-recomLine allowed for earlier diagnosis of toxoplasmic seroconversion compared to both ELISA tests and WB-LDBIO but led to insufficient performance to confirm the immune status when ELISA results were discordant or equivocal.

Indexed as

ToxoplasmaToxoplasmosisAntibodies, ProtozoanBlotting, WesternFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MPregnancyAntibodies, ProtozoanImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MImmunoblotSeroconversionSerologyToxoplasmosisWestern blot

Identifiers

PMID36350194
PMCPMC9645231
OpenAlexW4308834816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.