Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36350081›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental botany2023

Drought response in Arabidopsis displays synergistic coordination between stems and leaves.

Ajaree Thonglim, Giovanni Bortolami, Sylvain Delzon, Maximilian Larter, Remko Offringa, Joost J B Keurentjes, Erik Smets, Salma Balazadeh, Frederic Lens

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. In Silico Analysis of miRNA-mRNA Binding Sites inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ajaree ThonglimNaturalis Biodiversity Center, Research Group Functional Traits, PO Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3687-3802
Giovanni BortolamiNaturalis Biodiversity Center, Research Group Functional Traits, PO Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7528-9644
Sylvain DelzonBIOGECO INRA, Université Bordeaux, 33615 Pessac, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3442-1711
Maximilian LarterBIOGECO INRA, Université Bordeaux, 33615 Pessac, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5730-3203
Remko OffringaLeiden University, Institute of Biology Leiden, Plant Developmental Genetics, Sylviusweg 72, 2333 BE Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3293-5295
Joost J B KeurentjesLaboratory of Genetics, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8918-0711
Erik SmetsNaturalis Biodiversity Center, Research Group Functional Traits, PO Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9416-983X
Salma BalazadehLeiden University, Institute of Biology Leiden, Molecular Plant Stress Biology, Sylviusweg 72, 2333 BE Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5789-4071
Frederic LensNaturalis Biodiversity Center, Research Group Functional Traits, PO Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5001-0149
Leiden University · NLNaturalis Biodiversity Center · NLUMR BIOdiversity, GEnes & Communities · FRWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The synergy between drought-responsive traits across different organs is crucial in the whole-plant mechanism influencing drought resilience. These organ interactions, however, are poorly understood, limiting our understanding of drought response strategies at the whole-plant level. Therefore, we need more integrative studies, especially on herbaceous species that represent many important food crops but remain underexplored in their drought response. We investigated inflorescence stems and rosette leaves of six Arabidopsis thaliana genotypes with contrasting drought tolerance, and combined anatomical observations with hydraulic measurements and gene expression studies to assess differences in drought response. The soc1ful double mutant was the most drought-tolerant genotype based on its synergistic combination of low stomatal conductance, largest stomatal safety margin, more stable leaf water potential during non-watering, reduced transcript levels of drought stress marker genes, and reduced loss of chlorophyll content in leaves, in combination with stems showing the highest embolism resistance, most pronounced lignification, and thickest intervessel pit membranes. In contrast, the most sensitive Cvi ecotype shows the opposite extreme of the same set of traits. The remaining four genotypes show variations in this drought syndrome. Our results reveal that anatomical, ecophysiological, and molecular adaptations across organs are intertwined, and multiple (differentially combined) strategies can be applied to acquire a certain level of drought tolerance.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisAcclimatizationAdaptation, PhysiologicalDroughtsPlant LeavesArabidopsis thalianachlorophyll contentdrought responseembolism resistancegene expressionintervessel pit membrane thicknessstem anatomystomatal control

Identifiers

PMID36350081
PMCPMC9899417
OpenAlexW4308634259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.