Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36350080›Full record

ReviewBrain and behavior2022

Neuroimaging for differential diagnosis of transient neurological attacks.

Ying Wang, Hao Zha

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain and behavior, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ying WangDepartment of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3943-5728
Hao ZhaDepartment of Reproductive and Genetics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
Kunming Medical University · CN

Funding

Fundamental Research Program of Yunnan Province 202101AT070229National Natural Science Foundation of China 82060233
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRapid yet comprehensive neuroimaging protocols are required for patients with suspected acute stroke. However, stroke mimics can account for approximately one in five clinically diagnosed acute ischemic strokes and the rate of thrombolyzed mimics can be as high as 17%. Therefore, to accurately determine the diagnosis and differentiate mimics from true transient ischemic attacks, acute ischemic stroke is a challenge to every clinician. DISCUSSION: Medical history and neurological examination, noncontract head computed tomography, and routine magnetic resonance imaging play important roles in the assessment and management of patients with transient neurological attacks in the emergency department. This review attempts to summarize how neuroimaging can be utilized to help differentiate the most common mimics from transient ischemic attack and acute ischemic stroke.

conclusionAlthough imaging can help direct critical triage decisions for intravenous thrombolysis or endovascular therapy, more detailed medical history and neurological examination are crucial for making a prompt and accurate diagnosis for transient neurological attack patients.

Indexed as

Ischemic Attack, TransientIschemic StrokeStrokeDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansNeuroimagingacute ischemic strokecomputed tomographymagnetic resonance imagetransient and neurological attacktransient ischemic attack

Identifiers

PMID36350080
PMCPMC9759151
OpenAlexW4308638824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.