Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36349968›Full record

Trial reportEuropean heart journal2023

Cost-effectiveness of population screening for atrial fibrillation: the STROKESTOP study.

Johan Lyth, Emma Svennberg, Lars Bernfort, Mattias Aronsson, Viveka Frykman, Faris Al-Khalili, Leif Friberg, Mårten Rosenqvist, Johan Engdahl, Lars-Åke Levin

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European heart journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Population reach and participation rate in opportunistic vs. systematic atrial fibrillation screening: STROKESTOP III.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Screening for atrial fibrillation using an ECG monitoring patch among the elderly population in rural China: a single-arm study.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Cost-effectiveness of atrial fibrillation screening programmes across European nations.European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Brazilian Atrial Fibrillation Guidelines - 2025.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Johan LythDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4988-6346
Emma SvennbergDepartment of Medicine Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet Karolinska University Hospital, SE-141 86 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6413-0870
Lars BernfortDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0537-3319
Mattias AronssonDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5666-7061
Viveka FrykmanKarolinska Institutet, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0376-8133
Faris Al-KhaliliKarolinska Institutet, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8849-7052
Leif FribergKarolinska Institutet, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7453-0157
Mårten RosenqvistKarolinska Institutet, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3337-9259
Johan EngdahlKarolinska Institutet, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1677-7215
Lars-Åke LevinDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2581-4863

Funding

Bayer, and Bristol-Myers Squibb-PfizerBoehringer IngelheimCarl Bennet ABKing Gustav V and Queen Victoria's Freemasons' FoundationKlebergska FoundationScientific Council of Halland RegionSouthern Regional Healthcare CommitteeStockholm County CouncilSwedish Heart and Lung foundationSwedish Stroke FundThe Tornspiran FoundationTornspiran Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsPrevious studies on the cost-effectiveness of screening for atrial fibrillation (AF) are based on assumptions of long-term clinical effects. The STROKESTOP study, which randomised 27 975 persons aged 75/76 years into a screening invitation group and a control group, has a median follow-up time of 6.9 years. The aim of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of population-based screening for AF using clinical outcomes. METHODS AND

resultsThe analysis is based on a Markov cohort model. The prevalence of AF, the use of oral anticoagulation, clinical event data, and all-cause mortality were taken from the STROKESTOP study. The cost for clinical events, age-specific utilities, utility decrement due to stroke, and stroke death was taken from the literature. Uncertainty in the model was considered in a probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Per 1000 individuals invited to the screening, there were 77 gained life years and 65 gained quality-adjusted life years. The incremental cost was €1.77 million lower in the screening invitation group. Gained quality-adjusted life years to a lower cost means that the screening strategy was dominant. The result from 10 000 Monte Carlo simulations showed that the AF screening strategy was cost-effective in 99.2% and cost-saving in 92.7% of the simulations. In the base-case scenario, screening of 1000 individuals resulted in 10.6 [95% confidence interval (CI): -22.5 to 1.4] fewer strokes (8.4 ischaemic and 2.2 haemorrhagic strokes), 1.0 (95% CI: -1.9 to 4.1) more cases of systemic embolism, and 2.9 (95% CI: -18.2 to 13.1) fewer bleedings associated with hospitalization.

conclusionBased on the STROKESTOP study, this analysis shows that a broad AF screening strategy in an elderly population is cost-effective. Efforts should be made to increase screening participation.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationEmbolismStrokeAgedAnticoagulantsCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansMarkov ChainsMass ScreeningQuality-Adjusted Life YearsAnticoagulantsAtrial fibrillationCost-effectivenessMarkov modellingScreeningStroke prevention

Identifiers

PMID36349968
PMCPMC9839418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.