Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36349734›Full record

ReviewProteomics2022

Portable mass spectrometry system: instrumentation, applications, and path to 'omics analysis.

Jing Wang, Madison E Pursell, Amanda DeVor, Olanrewaju Awoyemi, Stephen J Valentine, Peng Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proteomics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Plasma/Serum Proteomics based on Mass Spectrometry.Protein and peptide letters · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jing WangC. Eugene Bennett Department of Chemistry, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
Madison E PursellC. Eugene Bennett Department of Chemistry, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
Amanda DeVorC. Eugene Bennett Department of Chemistry, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
Olanrewaju AwoyemiC. Eugene Bennett Department of Chemistry, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
Stephen J ValentineC. Eugene Bennett Department of Chemistry, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
Peng LiC. Eugene Bennett Department of Chemistry, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8332-7142

Funding

Development of VSSI-probe technology for in situ probing biological systems using mass spectrometryR01GM135432 · NIGMS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI LI, PENG · 2019 to 2023
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM135432
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mass spectrometry (MS) is an information rich analytical technique and plays a key role in various 'omics studies. Standard mass spectrometers are bulky and operate at high vacuum, which hinder their adoption by the broader community and utility in field applications. Developing portable mass spectrometers can significantly expand the application scope and user groups of MS analysis. This review discusses the basics and recent advancements in the development of key components of portable mass spectrometers including ionization source, mass analyzer, detector, and vacuum system. Further, major areas where portable mass spectrometers are applied are also discussed. Finally, a perspective on the further development of portable mass spectrometers including the potential benefits for 'omics analysis is provided.

Indexed as

Mass Spectrometryambient ionizationfield portable analysisinstrumentationminiature mass spectrometer

Identifiers

PMID36349734
PMCPMC10278091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.