Trial reportThe journal of international advanced otology2022
COVID-19 era: Hearing handicaps behind face mask use in hearing aid users.
Trial report in The journal of international advanced otology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Extending a COVID-19 Job Exposure Matrix: The SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19 Job Exposure Matrix Module (SCoVJEM Module) for Population-Based Studies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Potential Impacts of Prolonged Face Mask Use on Temporomandibular Joint Health as Neglected Lifestyle Repercussions of COVID-19 Pandemic-A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study was to assess the effect on speech perception and lack of hearing devices gain with surgical masks worn in hearing aid users.
methodsThis prospective cohort study enrolled consecutive patients between November 2020 and February 2021 in a tertiary care medical center from Spain. Fifty-five subjects have been included, 10 as control group, with normal hearing, and 45 patients with sensory-neural hearing loss and hearing aid users, ranging in age between 31 and 83 years old, and were recruited randomized in 4 months. Appropriate test was done previously to check adequate functioning from devices and suitable adaptation. Control group had no hearing impairment neither otologic disease.
resultsDisyllabic test in quiet get worse with face mask with a significant difference and stronger impact in noisy background. Age made no difference. Adding lipreading speech perception improved by 95.1 % for younger subjects (<50 years of age) and 91.2% for older subjects (>50 years of age). In the control sample, there was no differences in any condition.
conclusionDespite advantages of wearing mask in preventing coronavirus disease 2019 spread, we must consider that they have also drawbacks for some groups like hearing aid users. In this research, we have not observed high frequencies perception decrease with surgical masks worn, but there was reduction in speech perception, most notably in hearing aids wearers in noisy environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.