Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36349445›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2022

Estimating fine-scale changes in turbulence using the movements of a flapping flier.

Emmanouil Lempidakis, Andrew N Ross, Michael Quetting, Baptiste Garde, Martin Wikelski, Emily L C Shepard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emmanouil LempidakisDepartment of Biosciences, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2384-9093
Andrew N RossSchool of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8631-3512
Michael QuettingMax Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, Radolfzell, Germany.
Baptiste GardeDepartment of Biosciences, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8726-6279
Martin WikelskiMax Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, Radolfzell, Germany.
Emily L C ShepardDepartment of Biosciences, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7325-6398

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All animals that operate within the atmospheric boundary layer need to respond to aerial turbulence. Yet little is known about how flying animals do this because evaluating turbulence at fine scales (tens to approx. 300 m) is exceedingly difficult. Recently, data from animal-borne sensors have been used to assess wind and updraft strength, providing a new possibility for sensing the physical environment. We tested whether highly resolved changes in altitude and body acceleration measured onboard solo-flying pigeons (as model flapping fliers) can be used as qualitative proxies for turbulence. A range of pressure and acceleration proxies performed well when tested against independent turbulence measurements from a tri-axial anemometer mounted onboard an ultralight flying the same route, with stronger turbulence causing increasing vertical displacement. The best proxy for turbulence also varied with estimates of both convective velocity and wind shear. The approximately linear relationship between most proxies and turbulence levels suggests this approach should be widely applicable, providing insight into how turbulence changes in space and time. Furthermore, pigeons were able to fly in levels of turbulence that were unsafe for the ultralight, paving the way for the study of how freestream turbulence affects the costs and kinematics of animal flight.

Indexed as

Flight, AnimalWindAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaColumbidaeaccelerationbio-inspirationgustremote sensingultralightuncrewed aerial vehicle

Identifiers

PMID36349445
PMCPMC9653225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.