ArticleAmerican journal of medical genetics. Part A2023
Copy number variants suggest different molecular pathways for the pathogenesis of bladder exstrophy.
Article in American journal of medical genetics. Part A, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inferring the Relative Contributions of Evolutionary Processes Shaping X Chromosome Dynamics in the Common Marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) in the Presence of Twinning and Hematopoietic Chimerism.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Genetic analysis of two bladder exstrophy populations of South Asian and North American origin.Journal of pediatric urology · 2025Article
- EZH2 specifically regulates ISL1 during embryonic urinary tract formation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Copy number variants suggest different molecular pathways for the pathogenesis of bladder exstrophy.American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bladder exstrophy is a rare congenital malformation leaving the urinary bladder open in the midline of the abdomen at birth. There is a clear genetic background with chromosome aberrations, but so far, no consistent findings apart from 22q11-duplications detected in about 2%-3% of all patients. Some genes are implicated like the LZTR1, ISL1, CELSR3, and the WNT3 genes, but most are not explained molecularly. We have performed chromosomal microarray analysis on a cohort of 140 persons born with bladder exstrophy to look for submicroscopic chromosomal deletions and duplications. Pathogenic or possibly pathogenic microdeletions or duplications were found in 16 patients (11.4%) and further 9 with unknown significance. Two findings were in regions linked to known syndromes, two findings involved the same gene (MCC), and all other findings were unique. A closer analysis suggests a few gene networks that are involved in the pathogenesis of bladder exstrophy; the WNT-signaling pathway, the chromosome 22q11 region, the RIT2 and POU families, and involvement of the Golgi apparatus. Bladder exstrophy is a rare malformation and is reported to be associated with several chromosome aberrations. Our data suggest involvement of some specific molecular pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.