Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36349396›Full record

ArticleThe Australasian journal of dermatology2023

Consumer perceptions on privacy and confidentiality in dermatology for 3D total-body imaging.

Caitlin Horsham, Monika Janda, Melissa Kerr, H Peter Soyer, Liam J Caffery

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Australasian journal of dermatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Caitlin HorshamCentre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0354-3583
Monika JandaCentre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1728-8085
Melissa KerrThe University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Dermatology Research Centre, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
H Peter SoyerThe University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Dermatology Research Centre, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4770-561X
Liam J CafferyCentre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1899-7534

Funding

Australian Cancer Research FoundationNational Health and Medical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As 3D total-body photography for the early detection of melanoma is not yet widely used in clinical practice, we do not have a full understanding of patient's concerns about use, privacy and confidentiality, and if their concerns differ depending on the use-case. We conducted a virtual consumer forum to assess patients concerns about privacy and confidentiality in dermatology imaging for research, artificial intelligence development and for their own clinical care.

Indexed as

DermatologyPrivacyArtificial IntelligenceConfidentialityHumansPhotographyconfidentialitydiagnostic imagingmelanomapatient acceptance of health careprivacytelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID36349396
PMCPMC10952908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.