ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2022
Change in the Perception of Oral Antibiotics Among Medical Students After Participating in a Parenteral-to-Oral Conversion Program for Highly Bioavailable Antibiotics.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Appropriate conversion of antibiotics from a parenteral to the oral route can lower the risk of catheter-associated infections, reduce medical costs, and shorten hospitalization. This study investigated the effect of a parenteral-to-oral conversion program for highly bioavailable antibiotics on the perceptions of medical students regarding oral antibiotics. Methods: In 2021, the parenteral-to-oral conversion program was implemented as one of the activities of an antimicrobial stewardship program at a tertiary-care hospital in South Korea. This program was also implemented for fifth-year medical students in the hospital's infectious diseases department as a core clinical practice course. Medical students reviewed the medical records of patients taking antibiotics with a high oral bioavailability and wrote a recommendation for oral conversion after confirmation by an infectious disease specialist. A survey on the perception of oral antibiotics was administered to medical students before and after clinical practice to evaluate the educational effect of the program. Results: A total of 923 cases were reviewed, and more than one-fifth of the antibiotics with a high oral bioavailability were administered parenterally despite their oral conversion (20.6%, 190/923). Of these, 24.2% (46/190) accepted the written proposal within 48 hours, and 43.7% (83/190) declined the proposal. Through this program, students gained a proper perception of oral antibiotics. Conclusions: The parenteral-to-oral conversion program demonstrated an acceptance rate of oral antibiotic conversion in the hospital of 24.2% and had significant educational benefits for medical students, giving them the ability to construct an appropriate perception of oral antibiotics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.