ArticleRSC chemical biology2022
Alternative design strategies to help build the enzymatic retrosynthesis toolbox.
Article in RSC chemical biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimizing the conversion of phosphoenolpyruvate to lactate by enzymatic channeling with mixed nanoparticle display.Cell reports methods · 2024Article
- Article
- Self assembling nanoparticle enzyme clusters provide access to substrate channeling in multienzymatic cascades.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Progresses in Cell-Free In Vitro Evolution.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Most of the complex molecules found in nature still cannot be synthesized by current organic chemistry methods. Given the number of enzymes that exist in nature and the incredible potential of directed evolution, the field of synthetic biology contains perhaps all the necessary building blocks to bring about the realization of applied enzymatic retrosynthesis. Current thinking anticipates that enzymatic retrosynthesis will be implemented using conventional cell-based synthetic biology approaches where requisite native, heterologous, designer, and evolved enzymes making up a given multi-enzyme pathway are hosted by chassis organisms to carry out designer synthesis. In this perspective, we suggest that such an effort should not be limited by solely exploiting living cells and enzyme evolution and describe some useful yet less intensive complementary approaches that may prove especially productive in this grand scheme. By decoupling reactions from the environment of a living cell, a significantly larger portion of potential synthetic chemical space becomes available for exploration; most of this area is currently unavailable to cell-based approaches due to toxicity issues. In contrast, in a cell-free reaction a variety of classical enzymatic approaches can be exploited to improve performance and explore and understand a given enzyme's substrate specificity and catalytic profile towards non-natural substrates. We expect these studies will reveal unique enzymatic capabilities that are not accessible in living cells.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.