Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36349096›Full record

ArticleChemical science2022

End-to-end differentiable construction of molecular mechanics force fields.

Yuanqing Wang, Josh Fass, Benjamin Kaminow, John E Herr, Dominic Rufa, Ivy Zhang, Iván Pulido, Mike Henry, Hannah E Bruce Macdonald, Kenichiro Takaba and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Thousandfold Expansion Microscopy.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Beyond Classical Force Fields: Physics-Driven Assessment of the Grappa Machine-Learned Force Field on the FoldBind Dataset.Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Fine-Tuning DiffDock-L for Allosteric Kinase Docking.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yuanqing WangComputational and Systems Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York 10065 NY USA yuanqing.wang@choderalab.org john.chodera@choderalab.org.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4403-2015
Josh FassComputational and Systems Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York 10065 NY USA yuanqing.wang@choderalab.org john.chodera@choderalab.org.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3719-266X
Benjamin KaminowComputational and Systems Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York 10065 NY USA yuanqing.wang@choderalab.org john.chodera@choderalab.org.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2266-3353
John E HerrComputational and Systems Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York 10065 NY USA yuanqing.wang@choderalab.org john.chodera@choderalab.org.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5639-1520
Dominic RufaComputational and Systems Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York 10065 NY USA yuanqing.wang@choderalab.org john.chodera@choderalab.org.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0930-9445
Ivy ZhangComputational and Systems Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York 10065 NY USA yuanqing.wang@choderalab.org john.chodera@choderalab.org.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0628-6276
Iván PulidoComputational and Systems Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York 10065 NY USA yuanqing.wang@choderalab.org john.chodera@choderalab.org.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7178-8136
Mike HenryComputational and Systems Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York 10065 NY USA yuanqing.wang@choderalab.org john.chodera@choderalab.org.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3870-9993
Hannah E Bruce MacdonaldComputational and Systems Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York 10065 NY USA yuanqing.wang@choderalab.org john.chodera@choderalab.org.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5562-6866
Kenichiro TakabaComputational and Systems Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York 10065 NY USA yuanqing.wang@choderalab.org john.chodera@choderalab.org.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2481-8830
John D ChoderaComputational and Systems Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York 10065 NY USA yuanqing.wang@choderalab.org john.chodera@choderalab.org.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0542-119X

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Open data-driven infrastructure for building biomolecular force fields for predictive biophysics and drug designR01GM132386 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI SHIRTS, MICHAEL R · 2020 to 2023
$3.1M
The role of reorganization energy in achieving selective kinase inhibition"R01GM121505 · NIGMS · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI CHODERA, JOHN DAMON · 2017 to 2021
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM121505NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM132386
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular mechanics (MM) potentials have long been a workhorse of computational chemistry. Leveraging accuracy and speed, these functional forms find use in a wide variety of applications in biomolecular modeling and drug discovery, from rapid virtual screening to detailed free energy calculations. Traditionally, MM potentials have relied on human-curated, inflexible, and poorly extensible discrete chemical perception rules (atom types) for applying parameters to small molecules or biopolymers, making it difficult to optimize both types and parameters to fit quantum chemical or physical property data. Here, we propose an alternative approach that uses graph neural networks to perceive chemical environments, producing continuous atom embeddings from which valence and nonbonded parameters can be predicted using invariance-preserving layers. Since all stages are built from smooth neural functions, the entire process-spanning chemical perception to parameter assignment-is modular and end-to-end differentiable with respect to model parameters, allowing new force fields to be easily constructed, extended, and applied to arbitrary molecules. We show that this approach is not only sufficiently expressive to reproduce legacy atom types, but that it can learn to accurately reproduce and extend existing molecular mechanics force fields. Trained with arbitrary loss functions, it can construct entirely new force fields self-consistently applicable to both biopolymers and small molecules directly from quantum chemical calculations, with superior fidelity than traditional atom or parameter typing schemes. When adapted to simultaneously fit partial charge models, espaloma delivers high-quality partial atomic charges orders of magnitude faster than current best-practices with low inaccuracy. When trained on the same quantum chemical small molecule dataset used to parameterize the Open Force Field ("Parsley") openff-1.2.0 small molecule force field augmented with a peptide dataset, the resulting espaloma model shows superior accuracy

Identifiers

PMID36349096
PMCPMC9600499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.