Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36348981›Full record

ArticleJMIR infodemiology

Quantifying Changes in Vaccine Coverage in Mainstream Media as a Result of the COVID-19 Outbreak: Text Mining Study.

Bente Christensen, Daniel Laydon, Tadeusz Chelkowski, Dariusz Jemielniak, Michaela Vollmer, Samir Bhatt, Konrad Krawczyk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR infodemiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bente ChristensenDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science University of Southern Denmark Odense Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2013-3559
Daniel LaydonDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis Imperial College London London United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4270-3321
Tadeusz ChelkowskiDepartment of Management in the Network Society Kozminski University Warsaw Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0297-3650
Dariusz JemielniakDepartment of Management in the Network Society Kozminski University Warsaw Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3745-7931
Michaela VollmerDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis Imperial College London London United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6970-7192
Samir BhattDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis Imperial College London London United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0891-4611
Konrad KrawczykDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science University of Southern Denmark Odense Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0697-5522

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_19012Medical Research Council MR/R015600/1Medical Research Council MR/V038109/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Achieving herd immunity through vaccination depends upon the public's acceptance, which in turn relies on their understanding of its risks and benefits. The fundamental objective of public health messaging on vaccines is therefore the clear communication of often complex information and, increasingly, the countering of misinformation. The primary outlet shaping public understanding is mainstream online news media, where coverage of COVID-19 vaccines was widespread. Objective: We used text-mining analysis on the front pages of mainstream online news to quantify the volume and sentiment polarization of vaccine coverage. Methods: We analyzed 28 million articles from 172 major news sources across 11 countries between July 2015 and April 2021. We employed keyword-based frequency analysis to estimate the proportion of overall articles devoted to vaccines. We performed topic detection using BERTopic and named entity recognition to identify the leading subjects and actors mentioned in the context of vaccines. We used the Vader Python module to perform sentiment polarization quantification of all collated English-language articles. Results: The proportion of front-page articles mentioning vaccines increased from 0.1% to 4% with the outbreak of COVID-19. The number of negatively polarized articles increased from 6698 in 2015-2019 to 28,552 in 2020-2021. However, overall vaccine coverage before the COVID-19 pandemic was slightly negatively polarized (57% negative), whereas coverage during the pandemic was positively polarized (38% negative). Conclusions: Throughout the pandemic, vaccines have risen from a marginal to a widely discussed topic on the front pages of major news outlets. Mainstream online media has been positively polarized toward vaccines, compared with mainly negative prepandemic vaccine news. However, the pandemic was accompanied by an order-of-magnitude increase in vaccine news that, due to low prepandemic frequency, may contribute to a perceived negative sentiment. These results highlight important interactions between the volume of news and overall polarization. To the best of our knowledge, our work is the first systematic text mining study of front-page vaccine news headlines in the context of COVID-19.

Indexed as

acceptancechangecommunicationcoverageCOVID-19data mininghesitancyknowledgemedianewsoutbreaksentimentsocial mediatext miningunderstandingvaccine

Identifiers

PMID36348981
PMCPMC9631944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.