Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36348974›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2022

A remote speech-based AI system to screen for early Alzheimer's disease via smartphones.

Emil Fristed, Caroline Skirrow, Marton Meszaros, Raphael Lenain, Udeepa Meepegama, Stefano Cappa, Dag Aarsland, Jack Weston

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04828122 (A Study to Evaluate the Ability of Speech- and Language-based Digital Biomarkers to Detect and Characterise Prodromal and Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease in a Clinical Setting), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04828122 completednot on this map

A Study to Evaluate the Ability of Speech- and Language-based Digital Biomarkers to Detect and Characterise Prodromal and Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease in a Clinical Setting

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorNovoic LimitedRan2020 to 2021Enrolled141ConditionsAlzheimer Disease, Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease, Prodromal Alzheimer's Disease, Alzheimer's Disease (Incl Subtypes)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Emil FristedNovoic Ltd London UK.
Caroline SkirrowNovoic Ltd London UK.
Marton MeszarosNovoic Ltd London UK.
Raphael LenainNovoic Ltd London UK.
Udeepa MeepegamaNovoic Ltd London UK.
Stefano CappaIUSS Cognitive Neuroscience (ICoN) Center University School for Advanced Studies Pavia Italy.
Dag AarslandDepartment of Old Age Psychiatry Institute of Psychiatry Psychology & Neuroscience King's College London London UK.
Jack WestonNovoic Ltd London UK.
National Oilwell Varco (United Kingdom) · GBIstituto Universitario di Studi Superiori di Pavia · ITStavanger University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Artificial intelligence (AI) systems leveraging speech and language changes could support timely detection of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Methods: The AMYPRED study (NCT04828122) recruited 133 subjects with an established amyloid beta (Aβ) biomarker (66 Aβ+, 67 Aβ-) and clinical status (71 cognitively unimpaired [CU], 62 mild cognitive impairment [MCI] or mild AD). Daily story recall tasks were administered via smartphones and analyzed with an AI system to predict MCI/mild AD and Aβ positivity. Results: Eighty-six percent of participants (115/133) completed remote assessments. The AI system predicted MCI/mild AD (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.85, ±0.07) but not Aβ (AUC = 0.62 ±0.11) in the full sample, and predicted Aβ in clinical subsamples (MCI/mild AD: AUC = 0.78 ±0.14; CU: AUC = 0.74 ±0.13) on short story variants (immediate recall). Long stories and delayed retellings delivered broadly similar results. Discussion: Speech-based testing offers simple and accessible screening for early-stage AD.

Indexed as

Alzheimer's diseaseartificial intelligenceclinical assessmentclinical screeningdeep learningdiagnosticsdigital healthepisodic memorylanguagemachine learningmild cognitive impairmentremotespeech

Identifiers

PMID36348974
PMCPMC9632864
OpenAlexW4308684152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.