Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36348893›Full record

ReviewCureus2022

External Lumbar Drainage for Refractory Intracranial Hypertension in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review.

Andrew R Stevens, Wai C Soon, Yasir A Chowdhury, Emma Toman, Sebastian Yim, Tonny Veenith, Ramesh Chelvarajah, Antonio Belli, David Davies

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrew R StevensNeurosurgery, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, GBR.
Wai C SoonNeurosurgery, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, GBR.
Yasir A ChowdhuryNeurosurgery, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, GBR.
Emma TomanNeurosurgery, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, GBR.
Sebastian YimMedical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, GBR.
Tonny VeenithInstitute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, GBR.
Ramesh ChelvarajahNeurosurgery, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, GBR.
Antonio BelliNeurosurgery, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, GBR.
David DaviesNeurosurgery, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, GBR.
Birmingham Dental Hospital · GBNIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre · GBUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital · USUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Considerable variation exists in the clinical practice of cerebrospinal fluid diversion for medically refractory intracranial hypertension in patients with acute traumatic brain injury (TBI), which is achievable via lumbar or ventricular drainage. This systematic review sought to compile the available evidence for the efficacy and safety of the use of lumbar drains for intracranial pressure (ICP) control. A systematic review of the literature was performed with the search and data extraction performed by two reviewers independently in duplicate. Nine independent studies were identified, enrolling 230 patients, 159 with TBI. Efficacy for ICP control was observed across all studies, with immediate and sustained effect, reducing medical therapy requirements. Lumbar drainage with medical therapy appears effective when used alone and as an adjunct to ventricular drainage. Safety reporting varied in quality. Clinical or radiological incidents of cerebral herniation (with an unclear relationship to lumbar drainage) were observed in 14/230 patients resulting in one incident of morbidity without adverse patient outcome. The available data is generally poor in quality and volume, but supportive of the efficacy of lumbar drainage for ICP control. Few reports of adverse outcomes are suggestive of, but are insufficient to confirm, the safety of use in the appropriate patient and clinical setting. Further large prospective observational studies are required to generate sufficient support of an acceptable safety profile.

Indexed as

cerebrospinal fluid drainagecritical careintracranial hypertensionneurosurgerytraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID36348893
PMCPMC9637378
OpenAlexW4303444743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.