Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36348863›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

Gynaecological Laparoscopic Surgeries in the Omicron Era: Improvising the Management Skills After Lessons Learnt From the Delta Wave.

Avir Sarkar, K K Roy, Rinchen Zangmo, Maninder K Ghotra, Anshul Kulshreshtha, Ashmita Saha, Nilanchali Singh, Deepika Kashyap

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Avir SarkarObstetrics and Gynaecology, Employees' State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) Medical College and Hospital, Faridabad, Faridabad, IND.
K K RoyObstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, New Delhi, IND.
Rinchen ZangmoObstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, New Delhi, IND.
Maninder K GhotraObstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, New Delhi, IND.
Anshul KulshreshthaObstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, New Delhi, IND.
Ashmita SahaObstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, New Delhi, IND.
Nilanchali SinghObstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, New Delhi, IND.
Deepika KashyapObstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, New Delhi, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background During the peak of the Omicron wave, elective laparoscopic surgeries were restricted; however, semi-emergency and emergency cases were managed despite the limited resources and manpower. We conducted this study to assess the types of gynaecological laparoscopic surgeries performed, the difficulties faced during the Omicron wave, and how we could implement the lessons learnt from the previous Delta wave for better management of gynaecological cases in the Omicron wave. Methodology We conducted a prospective cohort study over a period of three months involving 105 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgeries. Based on the decision regarding surgical incision time, the surgeries were sub-classified into immediate, urgent, and expedited. The surgical outcome and satisfaction rates among the patients were assessed through various parameters. Results Most of the women (81.9%) were pre-menopausal. Diabetes and chronic hypertension were the predominant medical co-morbidities. Three patients had a history of cardiac valve replacement which required switching warfarin to unfractionated heparin in the pre-operative period. Nearly three-fourthsof the study patients were doubly vaccinated against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) (77; 73.4%). A total of 14 (13.3%) patients had a history of COVID-19 infection in the past two weeks prior to the current admission. Immediate, urgent, and expedited surgeries comprised 11.4%, 22.8%, and 65.8% of total surgeries, respectively. On assessing the ease of pre-operative preparation according to the five-point Likert scale, immediate, urgent, and expedited surgeries were rated with a mean score of two, four, and five, respectively. The mean duration of surgery in the immediate and urgent groups was 37.6 and 44.2 minutes, respectively. The expedited group comprising mostly laparoscopic myomectomies and hysterectomies required an average duration of 92.6 minutes. The mean rating of patient satisfaction measured by the Likert scale was four, five, and five, respectively, in the three subgroups. Pre-operative patient preparation during the Omicron wave was faster, thereby decreasing the decision to incision interval compared to the Delta wave. Conclusions The lessons learnt from the previous Delta wave were used to modify the existing hospital policies in the Omicron wave. More number of vaccinated ground staff, less stringent intubation and extubation protocols during surgery, and lesser duration of post-operative stay helped modify our existing hospital policies for better patient care and satisfaction.

Indexed as

covid-19 retrolaparoscopyminimally invasive gynaecological surgeriesomicron wavesars-cov-2

Identifiers

PMID36348863
PMCPMC9632541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.