Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36348848›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

Effects and Proposed Countermeasures of Abortion Bans and Restrictions on People With Uteruses and Society.

Efe S Disi, Oluwateniayo O Okpaise, Mary-Amadeus U Akpanobong, Sofiat O Eyinfunjowo, Stephanie A Ukwandu, Magdalene O Alabintei

Open access · diamondAbstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Efe S DisiCollege of Medicine, Madonna University, Elele, NGA.
Oluwateniayo O OkpaiseAcute Medicine, Medway Maritime Hospital, Gillingham, GBR.
Mary-Amadeus U AkpanobongMedicine, All Saints University Dominica, Roseau, DMA.
Sofiat O EyinfunjowoMedicine and Surgery, Olabisi Onabanjo University, Sagamu, NGA.
Stephanie A UkwanduMedicine, All Saints University Dominica, Roseau, DMA.
Magdalene O AlabinteiObstetrics and Gynecology, Federal Medical Center, Yenagoa, NGA.
Dominica State College · DMMadonna University · USMedway Maritime Hospital · GBUniversity of Kentucky · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the recent overturning of Roe V. Wade by the Supreme Court, access to abortions in many regions across the United States will become very limited as laws regarding fetal termination will be determined by state legislators rather than on a federal level. This article highlights the effects of Roe V. Wade's abolishment on individuals that can get pregnant, how unwanted pregnancies will affect society in general, and reasonable steps forward following the ban. We conducted an electronic search using PubMed, Google, and Google Scholar. The search was retrospective, and the preliminary results focused on articles about the rationale behind pregnancy termination and the overall effects of abortion and the ban. Review papers, original papers, and newspaper articles were eligible for use. Sample size and region of publication were not exclusionary criteria. Each author independently reviewed and extracted data to write up each assigned section, and group collaborations occurred to create the final draft. Out of the 93 resources reviewed, 32 sources were deemed eligible and used in this article. These resources included 23 journal articles, eight websites, and one book.. The data gathered showed that while abortions have many potential complications even when performed under regulated conditions, taking away the choice of those with a uterus is also not without consequence. The economic, familial, and societal implications should be considered moving forward as safety nets will need to be implemented for people with uterus and children involved.

Indexed as

abortionabortion 2022abortion ban and restrictionsabortion groundsabortion laws and societyfetal anomaliesillegal abortionmaternal health careroe v. wadetherapeutic abortion

Identifiers

PMID36348848
PMCPMC9632542
OpenAlexW4300981693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.