Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36348822›Full record

ArticleEurope's journal of psychology2022

Technostress, Coping, and Anxious and Depressive Symptomatology in University Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

John Galvin, Michael Scott Evans, Kenisha Nelson, Gareth Richards, Eirini Mavritsaki, Theodoros Giovazolias, Katerina Koutra, Ben Mellor, Maria Clelia Zurlo, Andrew Paul Smith and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Europe's journal of psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

John GalvinBirmingham City University, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Michael Scott EvansCardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Kenisha NelsonUniversity of Technology, Kingston, Jamaica.
Gareth RichardsNewcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Eirini MavritsakiBirmingham City University, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Theodoros GiovazoliasUniversity of Crete, Rethymno, 74100, Greece.
Katerina KoutraUniversity of Crete, Rethymno, 74100, Greece.
Ben MellorNewcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Maria Clelia ZurloUniversity of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Andrew Paul SmithCardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Federica ValloneUniversity of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Birmingham City University · GBCardiff University · GBCrete University Press · GRNewcastle University · GBUniversity of Naples Federico II · ITUniversity of Technology, Jamaica · JM

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic raised many challenges for university staff and students, including the need to work from home, which resulted in a greater reliance on technology. We collected questionnaire data from university students (N = 894) in three European countries: Greece, Italy, and the United Kingdom. Data were collected between 7th April 2020 and 19th June 2020, representing a period covering the first lockdown and university closures in these countries and across Europe generally. We tested the hypotheses that technology-related stressors (techno-overload, work-home conflict, techno-ease, techno-reliability, techno-sociality, and pace of change) would be associated with anxiety and depressive symptoms, and that coping styles (problem-focused, emotion-focused, and avoidance) would mediate these relationships. Results showed significant positive associations between techno-overload, work-home conflict and anxiety and depressive symptoms, and significant negative associations between techno-reliability, techno-ease and anxiety and depressive symptoms. A significant negative association was found between techno-sociality and depressive symptoms but not anxiety symptoms. No evidence was found for an association between pace of change and anxiety or depressive symptoms. Multiple mediation analyses revealed significant direct effects of techno-overload, work-home conflict and techno-ease on anxiety symptoms, and of work-home conflict and techno-ease on depressive symptoms. Work-home conflict had significant indirect effects on anxiety and depressive symptoms through avoidance coping. Techno-overload and techno-ease both had significant indirect effects on anxiety symptoms through problem- and emotion-focused coping. Techno-ease also had a significant indirect effect on depressive symptoms through problem-focused coping. The findings add to the body of evidence on technostress amongst university students and provide knowledge on how technostress translates through coping strategies into anxious and depressive symptoms during the disruption caused by the outbreak of a pandemic disease.

Indexed as

anxietycopingCOVID-19depressiontechnostressuniversity students

Identifiers

PMID36348822
PMCPMC9632553
OpenAlexW3183502444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.