ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2022
Comparison of Wound Healing Effect of Skin Micrograft Impregnated into Two Kinds of Artificial Dermis in a Murine Wound Model.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of autologous micrografts technology: a promising approach for chronic wound healing and tissue regeneration-a pilot study.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Mesenchymal stem cells-based drug delivery systems for diabetic foot ulcer: A review.World journal of diabetes · 2023Review
- Modified gelatin hydrogel nonwoven fabrics (Genocel) as a skin substitute in murine skin defects.Regenerative therapy · 2023Article
- Erratum: Comparison of Wound Healing Effect of Skin Micrograft Impregnated into Two Kinds of Artificial Dermis in a Murine Wound Model: Erratum.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A micrograft (MG) suspension produced by the Rigenera protocol has been used to stimulate tissue regeneration. Recently, a combination therapy of an artificial dermis and skin MG has been used to promote angiogenesis and granulation tissue formation in the artificial dermis. There are no reports comparing the differences in MG impregnation efficiency between different artificial dermis products. Therefore, we compared the impregnation of skin MG in Pelnac Gplus and Integra. Methods: Skin MG was prepared from the skin of C57BL/6JJcl mice using Rigeneracons and administered onto Pelnac Gplus and Integra sheets. The amount of MG suspension impregnated in Pelnac Gplus and Integra was evaluated. Pelnac Gplus and Integra sheets combined with MG were applied to murine defects, and wound area, neoepithelium length, granulation tissue formation, and newly formed capillaries were compared with the control groups on days 7 and 14. Results: The weight percentage of the MG absorbed by Pelnac Gplus and Integra was 88.8% ± 3.5% and 28.2% ± 7.0%, respectively ( Conclusions: Skin MG was successfully impregnated into Pelnac Gplus by simple administration but not into Integra. Administration of skin MG into the Pelnac Gplus promoted granulation formation and angiogenesis. Pelnac Gplus was more suitable than Integra in the combination therapy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.