ArticleSpine surgery and related research2022
Novel Modular Spine Blocks Affect the Lumbar Spine on Finite Element Analysis.
Article in Spine surgery and related research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biomechanical Effects of a Novel Pedicle Screw W-Type Rod Fixation for Lumbar Spondylolysis: A Finite Element Analysis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: There are various surgical interventions to manage osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. Modular spine block (MSB) is a novel intravertebral fixator that can be assembled. This study aimed to quantitatively investigate the force distribution in vertebrae with the various structural designs and implantation methods by finite element analysis (FEA). Methods: A three-dimensional nonlinear FEA of the L3 implanted with MSB was constructed. Different structural designs (solid vs. hollow) and implantation methods (three-layered vs. six-layered and unilateral vs. bilateral) were studied. The model was preloaded to 150 N-m before the effects of flexion, extension, torsion, and lateral bending were analyzed at the controlled ranges of motion of 20°, 15°, 8°, and 20°, respectively. The resultant intervertebral range of motion (ROM) and disk stress as well as intravertebral force distribution were analyzed at the adjacent segments. Results: The different layers of MSB provided similar stability at the adjacent segments regarding the intervertebral ROM and disk stress. Under stress tests, the force of the solid MSB was shown to be evenly distributed within the vertebrae. The maximum stress value of the unilaterally three-layered hollow MSB was generally lower than that of the bilaterally six-layered solid MSB. Conclusions: The MSB has little stress shielding effect on the intervertebral ROM and creates no additional loading to the adjacent disks. The surgeon can choose the appropriate numbers of MSB to fix vertebrae without worrying about poly(methyl methacrylate) extravasation, implant failure, or adjacent segment disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.