Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36348672›Full record

ArticleSpine surgery and related research2022

Revision Surgery Due to Proximal Junctional Failure and Rod Fracture in Adult Deformity Surgery at a Single Institution in Japan.

Tatsuya Yasuda, Yu Yamato, Tomohiko Hasegawa, Go Yoshida, Tomohiro Banno, Hideyuki Arima, Shin Oe, Yuki Mihara, Koichiro Ide, Yukihiro Matsuyama

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Spine surgery and related research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Sagittal alignment of diverse mechanical complications following adult spinal deformity surgery.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tatsuya YasudaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Iwata City Hospital, Iwata, Japan.
Yu YamatoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Tomohiko HasegawaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Go YoshidaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Tomohiro BannoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Hideyuki ArimaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Shin OeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Yuki MiharaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Koichiro IdeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Yukihiro MatsuyamaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Iwata City Hospital, Iwata, Japan.
Hamamatsu University School of Medicine · JPIwata City Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Proximal junctional failure (PJF) and rod fracture (RF) are the primary reasons for revision surgery after a long corrective fusion for the adult spinal deformity (ASD). However, many recent studies on ASD are multicenter studies from the US and European racial characteristics may differ from those of Asians. Therefore, the risk factors for revision surgery because of PJF and RF after ASD surgery were evaluated in Japanese patients. Methods: Patients with ASD who underwent corrective surgery from the thoracic vertebrae to the ilium at the authors' institution were reviewed. Demographic, surgical, and radiographic parameters were included in the analysis. Univariate and multivariate regression models were used to analyze the risk factors for PJF and RF. Results: Two hundred and fifty-nine patients were included in the study. A total of 73 patients (28.1%) required revision surgery because of mechanical complications and 15 patients (5.7%) required revision surgery because of PJF on average 380 days after surgery. In PJF cases, body mass index (BMI) and pelvic tilt were significantly higher (p=0.01, p=0.048, respectively). BMI was an independent risk factor for revision owing to PJF (odds ratio [OR], 1.16; p=0.013). A total of 49 patients (18.9%) required revision owing to RF on average 867 days after surgery. Three-column osteotomy (p<0.001), significant blood loss (p=0.048), number of fusion segments (p=0.023), absence of lateral lumbar interbody fusion (p<0.001), and sagittal imbalance (p=0.033) were risk factors for revision surgery owing to RF in the univariate analysis. Three-column osteotomy (OR 4.41; p<0.001) and number of fusion segments (OR 1.21; p<0.009) were independent factors for revision surgery owing to RF. Conclusions: PJF occurred in a relatively early phase (approximately 1 year) after surgery in patients with ASD with high BMI. Conversely, RF occurred approximately 2.5 years after surgery in three-column osteotomy and spinal fusion cases that involvedlonger fusion range.

Indexed as

adult spinal deformitymechanical complicationproximal junctional failurerevision surgeryrod fracture

Identifiers

PMID36348672
PMCPMC9605756
OpenAlexW4211139763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.