ArticleSpine surgery and related research2022
Clinical Outcomes and Complications of Corrective Fusion Surgery Down to L4, L5, and the Pelvis for Adult Scoliosis in Patients Younger than 50 Years.
Article in Spine surgery and related research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prediction of Fusion Rod Curvature Angles in Posterior Scoliosis Correction Using Artificial Intelligence.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2024Article
- The role of lumbosacral paraspinal muscle degeneration and low vertebral bone mineral density on distal instrumentation-related problems following long-instrumented spinal fusion for degenerative lumbar scoliosis: a retrospective cohort study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Corrective fusion for adult scoliosis often requires fusion from the thoracic spine to the lower lumbar spine or pelvis. However, it is often difficult to determine the lowest instrumented vertebrae (LIV), especially in younger patients. The purpose of this study was to summarize the clinical outcomes and revision surgery rates after corrective fusion for adult scoliosis at different LIV levels in patients under 50 years of age. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 25 patients with adult scoliosis (mean age, 38 years; mean follow-up, 65 months) who underwent corrective fusion from the thoracic spine to L4, L5, or pelvis between 2010 and 2018. Preoperative and at least 2 years' postoperative radiographic parameters, patient-reported outcomes (Scoliosis Research Society-22r [SRS-22r]), mechanical complications, and revision surgery were investigated, and comparisons were made between two groups: the L4 and L5 (L) group (n=14) and the pelvic group (n=11). Results: Both groups showed a significant improvement in the SRS-22r domains of Self-image and Subtotal postoperatively compared with the baseline ( Conclusions: In the L group, clinical outcomes improved in the medium term, with no patients requiring revision surgery. In the pelvic group, the rod fracture rate was higher, but the clinical outcomes improved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.