Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36348665›Full record

SynthesisPeerJ2022

Diagnostic performance of circulating tumor DNA as a minimally invasive biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jia Jie Li, Yanqing Lv, Huifan Ji

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PeerJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jia Jie LiHepatobiliary Pancreatic Department, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Yanqing LvDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Medicine, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Huifan JiDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Medicine, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China.
First Hospital of Jilin University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Materials and Methods: We enrolled all relevant studies published up to 5 January 2022. Three primary subgroups were investigated: qualitative or quantitative ctDNA analyses, combined alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and ctDNA assay. In addition to the three primary subgroups, we also evaluated the diagnostic value of methylated SEPTIN9 (mSEPT9), which has been studied extensively in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. After a search based on four primary databases, we used a bivariate linear mixed model to analyze the pooled sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). We also plotted hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics (HSROC) and utilized lambda as well as the area under the curve (AUC) to create summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves to estimate the diagnostic value of ctDNA. Results: A total of 59 qualified articles with 9,766 subjects were incorporated into our meta-analysis. The integrated SEN, SPE, and DOR in the qualitative studies were 0.50 (95% CI [0.43-0.56]), 0.90 (95% CI [0.86-0.93]), and 8.72 (95% CI [6.18-12.32]), respectively, yielding an AUC of 0.78 and lambda of 1.93 (95% CI [1.56-2.33]). For quantitative studies, the corresponding values were 0.69 (95% CI [0.63-0.74]), 0.84 (95% CI [0.77-0.89]), 11.88 (95% CI [7.78-18.12]), 0.81, and 2.32 (95% CI [1.96-2.69]), respectively. Six studies were included to evaluate the SETP9 methylation, which yielded an AUC of 0.86, a SEN of 0.80 (95% CI [0.71-0.87]), and a SPE of 0.77 (95% CI [0.68-0.85]). Likewise, ctDNA concentration yielded an AUC of 0.73, with a SEN of 0.63 (95% CI [0.56-0.70]) and a SPE of 0.86 (95% CI [0.74-0.93]). AFP combined with ctDNA assay resulted in an AUC of 0.89, with a SEN of 0.82 (95% CI [0.77-0.86]) and a SPE of 0.84 (95% CI [0.76-0.90]). Conclusion: This study shows that circulating tumor DNA, particularly mSEPT9, shows promising diagnostic potential in HCC; however, it is not enough to diagnose HCC independently, and ctDNA combined with conventional assays such as AFP can effectively improve diagnostic performance.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularCirculating Tumor DNALiver Neoplasmsalpha-FetoproteinsHumansROC Curvealpha-FetoproteinsCirculating Tumor DNACirculating tumor DNADiagnostic performanceDNA MethylationHepatocellular carcinomaMeta-analysismSEPT9

Identifiers

PMID36348665
PMCPMC9637356
OpenAlexW4308250769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.