Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36348507›Full record

ArticleJournal of chest surgery2022

High Mini-Skin Incision during Carotid Endarterectomy for Carotid Stenosis.

Byeng Hun Jeon, Chul Ho Lee, Jae Seok Jang, Jun Woo Cho

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chest surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Byeng Hun JeonDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Daegu Catholic University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4384-6703
Chul Ho LeeDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Daegu Catholic University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9139-0619
Jae Seok JangDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Daegu Catholic University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0693-8863
Jun Woo ChoDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Daegu Catholic University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0786-9775
Daegu Catholic University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is used to treat carotid stenosis, which is associated with cerebral infarction and may result in neurologic deficits such as stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), and local nerve injury. To decrease surgery-related complications and improve patient satisfaction with esthetic outcomes, efforts have been made to minimize incision size instead of using a standard longitudinal incision. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 151 cases of CEA, of which 110 used conventional incisions and 41 used high mini-skin incisions (HMIs), from March 2015 to December 2021 at a single institution. Short-term (30-day) postoperative results were evaluated for rates of mortality, stroke, TIA, and cranial/cervical nerve injuries. Risk factors for nerve injury were also assessed. Results: The HMI group showed significantly (p<0.01) shorter operative and clamp times than the conventional group. The HMI group also had significantly shorter incision lengths (5.3±0.9 cm) than the conventional group (11.5±2.8 cm). The rates of stroke, TIA, and death at 30 days were not significantly different between the 2 groups. There was no significant difference in the rate of cranial and cervical nerve injuries, and all injuries were transient. A high lesion level (odds ratio [OR], 9.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.21-28.42; p<0.01) and the clamp time (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.03-1.12; p<0.01) were found to be risk factors for nerve injuries. Conclusion: Use of the HMI in CEA for carotid stenosis was advantageous for its shorter operative time, shorter internal carotid artery clamp time, reduced neurologic complications, and improved esthetics.

Indexed as

Carotid endarterectomyCarotid stenosisCranial and cervical nerveMini-skin incision

Identifiers

PMID36348507
PMCPMC9733414
OpenAlexW4308571607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.