Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36348369›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2022

Depot buprenorphine as an opioid agonist therapy in New South Wales correctional centres: a costing model.

R Ling, B White, J Roberts, M Cretikos, M V Howard, P S Haber, N Lintzeris, P Reeves, A J Dunlop, A Searles

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. The Socioeconomic Impact of Long-Acting Injectable Buprenorphine.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

R LingHunter Medical Research Institute, University of Newcastle, Lot 1 Kookaburra Cct, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 2305, Newcastle, Australia. rod.ling@hmri.org.au.
B WhiteDrug and Alcohol Clinical Research and Improvement Network, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
J RobertsDrug and Alcohol Clinical Research and Improvement Network, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
M CretikosCentre for Population Health, NSW Ministry of Health, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.
M V HowardCorrective Services New South Wales, Sydney NSW, Australia.
P S HaberDrug and Alcohol Clinical Research and Improvement Network, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
N LintzerisDrug and Alcohol Clinical Research and Improvement Network, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
P ReevesHunter Medical Research Institute, University of Newcastle, Lot 1 Kookaburra Cct, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 2305, Newcastle, Australia.
A J DunlopHunter Medical Research Institute, University of Newcastle, Lot 1 Kookaburra Cct, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 2305, Newcastle, Australia.
A SearlesHunter Medical Research Institute, University of Newcastle, Lot 1 Kookaburra Cct, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 2305, Newcastle, Australia.
Hunter Medical Research Institute · AUUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AUNew South Wales Department of Health · AUSouth Eastern Sydney Local Health District · AUSydney Local Health District · AUUniversity of Sydney · AU

Funding

NSW Ministry of Health dBC2531
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2019 daily liquid methadone and sublingual buprenorphine-naloxone were primary opioid agonist treatments for correctional centres in New South Wales, Australia. However, both had significant potential for diversion to other patients, and their daily administration was resource intensive. An alternative treatment in the form of subcutaneous depot buprenorphine became a viable option following a safety trial in 2020 - the UNLOC-T study. Depot preparation demonstrated advantages over current treatments as more difficult to divert and requiring fewer administrations. This paper reports the results of economic modelling of staffing costs in medication administration comparing depot buprenorphine, methadone, and sublingual buprenorphine provision in UNLOC-T trial facilities.

methodsThe costing study adopted a micro-costing approach involving the synthesis of cost data from the UNLOC-T clinical trial as well as data collected from Justice Health and Forensic Mental Health Network records. Labour and materials data were collected during site observations and interviews. Costs were calculated from two payer perspectives: a) the New South Wales (state) government which funds custodial and health services; and b) the Australian Commonwealth government, which pays for medications. The analysis compared the monthly-per-patient cost for each of the three medications in trial-site facilities during July 2019. This was followed by simulation of depot buprenorphine implementation across the study population. Costs associated with medical assessment and reviews were excluded.

resultsThe monthly-per-patient New South Wales government service costs of depot buprenorphine, methadone and sublingual buprenorphine were: $151, $379 and $1,529 respectively while Commonwealth government medication costs were $434, $80 and $525. The implementation simulation found that service costs of depot buprenorphine declined as patients transitioned from weekly to monthly administration. Costs of treatment using the other medications increased as patient numbers decreased alongside fixed costs. At 12 months, monthly-per-patient service costs for depot buprenorphine, methadone and sublingual buprenorphine-which would be completely phased out by month 13-were $92, $530 and $2,162 respectively.

conclusionsDepot buprenorphine was consistently the least costly of the treatment options. Future modelling could allow for dynamic patient populations and downstream impacts for participants and the state health system.

trial registrationACTRN12618000942257 . Registered 4 June 2018.

Indexed as

BuprenorphineOpioid-Related DisordersAnalgesics, OpioidAustraliaHumansMethadoneNew South WalesAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineMethadoneCosting studyEconomicsOpiate agonist therapy

Identifiers

PMID36348369
PMCPMC9644557
OpenAlexW4308509776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.