Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36348336›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

Developmental disparities in sedentary time by period of the day among US youth: a cross-sectional study.

María Enid Santiago-Rodríguez, Jinsong Chen, Karin A Pfeiffer, David X Marquez, Angela Odoms-Young, Eduardo Esteban Bustamante

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Screen time and allostatic load among youth: findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2015-2018.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

María Enid Santiago-RodríguezChild Movement, Activity, and Development Health Laboratory, School of Kinesiology (SKB Suite 1000), University of Michigan, 830 N. University Ave, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. marenid@umich.edu.
Jinsong ChenCollege of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, USA.
Karin A PfeifferDepartment of Kinesiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA.
David X MarquezDepartment of Kinesiology & Nutrition, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, USA.
Angela Odoms-YoungDivision of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, USA.
Eduardo Esteban BustamanteDepartment of Kinesiology & Nutrition, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, USA.
University of Illinois Chicago · USCornell University · USMichigan State University · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of Nevada, Reno · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDefinitive evidence shows sedentary time (ST) is an independent risk factor for chronic disease, irrespective of physical activity. Despite calls to limit youth ST, studies demonstrate a spike in ST at the transition from childhood to adolescence. Identifying periods of the day (e.g., before school, during school, afterschool, and evenings) during which ST is higher in adolescents vs. children-that is, specifying when within daily routines ST disparities emerge-may be important to inform intervention strategies, as periods of the day correspond with variations in setting and supervision. The purpose of this study was to examine device-assessed ST engagement by period of day and developmental stage in a nationally representative sample of United States youth.

methodsYouth (N = 2,972 between 6-18 years) from the 2003-2004 and 2005-2006 waves of NHANES reported demographic variables and wore an accelerometer for seven consecutive days to determine ST. Linear regression analyses were applied to study associations between ST and developmental stage (childhood or adolescence) by period of the week and weekend days, while controlling for sex, race/ethnicity, annual family income, and body mass index.

resultsAdjusted linear regressions (p-values < 0.0001) showed that adolescents were more sedentary than children during school, afterschool, and weekday evening periods as well as all the weekend periods. However, during school (36.3 ± 7.3 vs. 28.2 ± 7.2 min/hour; b = -7.4 [-8.1, -6.6]) and afterschool periods (31.1 ± 7.7 vs. 22.7 ± 7.0 min/hour; b = -7.8 [-8.6, -7.0]) showed the largest weekly ST disparities by developmental stage. Overall, the during school and after school hours constitute most (during school = 35% and afterschool = 16%) of the weekly ST disparity between children and adolescents.

conclusionsOur data provide interventionists with estimates of the potential for ST reduction in each setting and period of the day among US adolescents. Future research should gather information about the barriers and facilitators of ST in adolescents by period of the day to help understand factors driving disparities.

Indexed as

AccelerometrySedentary BehaviorAdolescentChildCross-Sectional StudiesExerciseHumansNutrition SurveysAccelerometryAdolescentsChildrenDisparitiesMovement Behavior

Identifiers

PMID36348336
PMCPMC9644603
OpenAlexW4308571876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.