Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36348320›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2022

Teaching cards as low-cost and brief materials for teaching basic life support to 6-10-year-old primary school children - a quasi-experimental combination design study.

Anita Kovács, Henrietta Bánfai-Csonka, József Betlehem, Luca Anna Ferkai, Krisztina Deutsch, János Musch, Bálint Bánfai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anita KovácsInstitute of Emergency Care and Pedagogy of Health, University of Pécs Faculty of Health Sciences, Vörösmarty Street 4, 7621, Pécs, Hungary.
Henrietta Bánfai-CsonkaInstitute of Emergency Care and Pedagogy of Health, University of Pécs Faculty of Health Sciences, Vörösmarty Street 4, 7621, Pécs, Hungary.
József BetlehemInstitute of Emergency Care and Pedagogy of Health, University of Pécs Faculty of Health Sciences, Vörösmarty Street 4, 7621, Pécs, Hungary.
Luca Anna FerkaiInstitute of Emergency Care and Pedagogy of Health, University of Pécs Faculty of Health Sciences, Vörösmarty Street 4, 7621, Pécs, Hungary.
Krisztina DeutschInstitute of Emergency Care and Pedagogy of Health, University of Pécs Faculty of Health Sciences, Vörösmarty Street 4, 7621, Pécs, Hungary.
János MuschInstitute of Emergency Care and Pedagogy of Health, University of Pécs Faculty of Health Sciences, Vörösmarty Street 4, 7621, Pécs, Hungary.
Bálint BánfaiInstitute of Emergency Care and Pedagogy of Health, University of Pécs Faculty of Health Sciences, Vörösmarty Street 4, 7621, Pécs, Hungary. balint.banfai@etk.pte.hu.
University of Pecs · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTeaching Basic Life Support (BLS) in schools is a key initiative to improve the survival rates after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Low-cost training materials can reach a wider population. Our aim was to compare the effectiveness of using teaching cards with the traditional instructor-led and combined methods on BLS skills and attitude and to evaluate the long-term effects after two months.

methodsA quasi-experimental combination design study. Two hundred sixty-three schoolchildren aged 6 to 10 years were assigned to three groups with different methods to teach BLS: teaching card group (n = 100), traditional instructor-led teaching group (n = 91), combined teaching group (n = 72). BLS skills and attitude were measured and compared before the training (T0), after the training (T1), and two months later (T2).

resultsBLS skills improved in every group at T1 compared to T0 (p < 0.001) and remained higher at T2 than at T0 in almost all cases (p < 0.001). Skill performance was similar in most of the skills between the three groups at T1. The best skill scores acquired were calling the ambulance and the correct hand position by chest compression. Positioning the head during check the breathing was more effective in the traditional group (48.4%) and combined group (61.1%) than in the teaching card group (19.0%) (p < 0.001) at T1. However, some skills improved significantly in the teaching card group at T2: check breathing for 10 s (p = 0.016); positioning the head by check breathing (p < 0.001); and positioning the head by ventilation (p = 0.011). Attitude did not change significantly in any of the groups (p > 0.05). Furthermore, the level of attitude was inferior in the teaching card group compared with the traditional (p = 0.005), and the combined groups (p = 0.049).

conclusionUsing low-cost materials for teaching BLS for young schoolchildren can improve their skills, however, could not improve attitudes. Teaching cards were not inferior compared to traditional and combined methods in some skills but inferior in others. Therefore, hands-on training opportunity is still important. Teaching cards are useful for long-term learning. To learn correctly the whole sequence of BLS is difficult for 6 to 10 years-old children, however, they are able to learn more BLS-related skills separately.

Indexed as

Audiovisual AidsCardiopulmonary ResuscitationSchoolsAttitudeChildEducational MeasurementHumansLearningTeachingAttitudeBasic Life SupportEducationKIDS SAVE LIVESResuscitation trainingSchoolchildrenTeachingTeaching cards

Identifiers

PMID36348320
PMCPMC9641917
OpenAlexW4308592089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.