Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36348209›Full record

ArticleMedicine, health care, and philosophy2023

Lost in translation? Conceptions of privacy and independence in the technical development of AI-based AAL.

Kris Vera Hartmann, Nadia Primc, Giovanni Rubeis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, health care, and philosophy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kris Vera HartmannInstitute for History and Ethics of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. krisvhartmann@posteo.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7101-9604
Nadia PrimcInstitute for History and Ethics of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3881-8057
Giovanni RubeisDepartment of General Health Studies, Division Biomedical and Public Health Ethics, Karl Landsteiner Private University for Health Sciences, Krems, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8265-9436

Funding

Hans-Böckler-Stiftung Hans-Böckler-StiftungMinisterium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst Baden-Württemberg Ministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst Baden-Württemberg
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AAL encompasses smart home technologies that are installed in the personal living environment in order to support older, disabled, as well as chronically ill people with the goal of delaying or reducing their need for nursing care in a care facility. Artificial intelligence (AI) is seen as an important tool for assisting the target group in their daily lives. A literature search and qualitative content analysis of 255 articles from computer science and engineering was conducted to explore the usage of ethical concepts. From an ethical point of view, the concept of independence and self-determination on the one hand and the possible loss of privacy on the other hand are widely discussed in the context of AAL. These concepts are adopted by the technical discourse in the sense that independence, self-determination and privacy are recognized as important values. Nevertheless, our research shows that these concepts have different usages and meanings in the ethical and the technical discourses. In the paper, we aim to map the different meanings of independence, self-determination and privacy as they can be found in the context of technological research on AI-based AAL systems. It investigates the interpretation of these ethical and social concepts which technicians try to build into AAL systems. In a second step, these interpretations are contextualized with concepts from the ethical discourse on AI-based assistive technologies.

Indexed as

Persons with DisabilitiesSelf-Help DevicesArtificial IntelligenceHumansPrivacyTechnologyAmbient assisted livingArtificial intelligenceEthicsPrivacySelf-determination

Identifiers

PMID36348209
PMCPMC9984520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.