Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36348203›Full record

ArticleHealth & justice2022

Enhancing community integration after incarceration: findings from a prospective study of an intensive peer support intervention for veterans with an historical comparison group.

Justeen Hyde, Thomas Byrne, Beth Ann Petrakis, Vera Yakovchenko, Bo Kim, Graeme Fincke, Rendelle Bolton, Christy Visher, Jessica Blue-Howells, Mari-Lynn Drainoni and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health & justice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Access to Healthcare Among Young Adult Probationers Participating in a Pilot Health-Focused Reentry Program.International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Justeen HydeCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, MA, 200 Springs Road, MS 152, Bldg. 70, Rm 285, Bedford, Bedford, MA, 01730, USA. Justeen.Hyde@va.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5155-0924
Thomas ByrneCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, MA, 200 Springs Road, MS 152, Bldg. 70, Rm 285, Bedford, Bedford, MA, 01730, USA.
Beth Ann PetrakisCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, MA, 200 Springs Road, MS 152, Bldg. 70, Rm 285, Bedford, Bedford, MA, 01730, USA.
Vera YakovchenkoCenter for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Bo KimCenter for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Graeme FinckeCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, MA, 200 Springs Road, MS 152, Bldg. 70, Rm 285, Bedford, Bedford, MA, 01730, USA.
Rendelle BoltonCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, MA, 200 Springs Road, MS 152, Bldg. 70, Rm 285, Bedford, Bedford, MA, 01730, USA.
Christy VisherCenter for Drug & Health Studies, Department of Sociology and Criminal Justice, University of Delaware, Wilmington, DE, USA.
Jessica Blue-HowellsVA Healthcare for Re-Entry Veterans, U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs, Washington, USA.
Mari-Lynn DrainoniDepartment of Health Law Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
D Keith McInnesCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, MA, 200 Springs Road, MS 152, Bldg. 70, Rm 285, Bedford, Bedford, MA, 01730, USA.
Boston University · USVA New England Healthcare System · USUniversity of Delaware · USVA Boston Healthcare System · USVA Pittsburgh Healthcare System · US

Funding

Quality Enhancement Research Initiative 15-284
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe transition to the community after incarceration presents challenges for returning citizens, including the immediate need to secure housing, employment, and income. Additionally, health care is essential for this population due to high rates of chronic physical health and mental health problems and substance use disorders. There is growing recognition of the need for interventions that support returning citizens as they navigate community reintegration while simultaneously tending to physical and behavioral health needs. We developed and pilot tested a peer support intervention designed to provide social, emotional, and logistic support and promote linkage and engagement in healthcare for returning citizens. We tested the intervention with US military veterans in Massachusetts who were being released from prison and jail. Outcomes related to linkage to and engagement in healthcare were evaluated using an historical comparison group. Engagement in peer support, housing status, and reincarceration rates were monitored for the intervention group.

resultsThere were 43 veterans in the intervention group, and 36 in the historical comparison group. For linkage to primary care within 90 days of release, there were no statistically significant differences between the intervention and comparison groups (58% versus 67%). Intervention participants were significantly more likely to receive substance use treatment than the comparison group (86% versus 19%, p < .0001) and the mean monthly substance use visits was greater in the intervention group (0.96 versus 0.34, p < .007). Engagement in mental health services was greater for the intervention group than the comparison group (93% versus 64%, p < .003). There were no significant differences between groups for emergency department use and hospitalization. At the end of the study period, the majority of intervention participants who had been released for over a year were living in permanent housing (84%). Recidivism among the was low, with 7% re-arrested during the study period.

conclusionsAugmenting reentry support through intensive peer support appears to have substantial benefits for veterans in terms of engaging them in health care and contributing to their longer-term stability, including housing and recidivism. Flexible reentry support such as this intervention may be well suited to meet the widely varying needs of returning citizens.

Indexed as

IncarcerationLinkage to HealthcareLinkage to HousingPeer SupportReentryVeterans

Identifiers

PMID36348203
PMCPMC9644600
OpenAlexW4308541957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.