SynthesisSurgery today2024
Effects of preoperative needle biopsy for lung cancer on survival and recurrence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Surgery today, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Serial changes in pleural lavage cytology during lung cancer surgery predict recurrence and pleural dissemination.Surgery today · 2026Article
- Association of Shorter Time to Recurrence and Recurrence-Free Survival with Transthoracic Lung Biopsy in Stage I Lung Cancer.Cancer research and treatment · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Needle biopsy (NB) is used for the diagnosis of lung cancer, but there is still controversy about its effect on the prognosis after surgery. We conducted this meta-analysis to compare the prognosis of lung cancer patients who underwent preoperative NB with that of those who did not. We systematically searched seven databases and Google Scholar for eligible studies. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed as primary outcome measures. Nine articles with a collective total of 13,541 patients (NB group, n = 4550; non-NB group, n = 8991) were included in our meta-analysis. OS [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.43 (0.96, 2.12), p = 0.08] and RFS (HR = 1.59 [1.25, 2.01], p = 0.0001) tended to be better in the non-NB group than in the NB group. Pleural recurrence (risk ratio (RR) = 2.40 [1.42, 4.07], p = 0.001) was significantly lower in the non-NB group than in the NB group. The recurrence analysis data did not reach significance, but the overall trend was better for the non-NB group. These findings demonstrate that NB is detrimental to the survival prognosis of lung cancer patients and increases the chance of pleural recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.