Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36348120›Full record

ArticleResults and problems in cell differentiation2022

Simulation of Different Three-Dimensional Models of Whole Interphase Nuclei Compared to Experiments - A Consistent Scale-Bridging Simulation Framework for Genome Organization.

Tobias A Knoch

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Results and problems in cell differentiation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 68% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tobias A KnochBiophysical Genomics, TAKnoch Joined Operations Administrative Office, Mannheim, Germany. TA.Knoch@taknoch.org.
Molecular Microbiology and Genomics Consultants (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The three-dimensional architecture of chromosomes, their arrangement, and dynamics within cell nuclei are still subject of debate. Obviously, the function of genomes-the storage, replication, and transcription of genetic information-has closely coevolved with this architecture and its dynamics, and hence are closely connected. In this work a scale-bridging framework investigates how of the 30 nm chromatin fibre organizes into chromosomes including their arrangement and morphology in the simulation of whole nuclei. Therefore, mainly two different topologies were simulated with corresponding parameter variations and comparing them to experiments: The Multi-Loop-Subcompartment (MLS) model, in which (stable) small loops form (stable) rosettes, connected by chromatin linkers, and the Random-Walk/Giant-Loop (RW/GL) model, in which large loops are attached to a flexible non-protein backbone, were simulated for various loop and linker sizes. The 30 nm chromatin fibre was modelled as a polymer chain with stretching, bending and excluded volume interactions. A spherical boundary potential simulated the confinement to nuclei with different radii. Simulated annealing and Brownian Dynamics methods were applied in a four-step decondensation procedure to generate from metaphase decondensated interphase configurations at thermodynamical equilibrium. Both the MLS and the RW/GL models form chromosome territories, with different morphologies: The MLS rosettes result in distinct subchromosomal domains visible in electron and confocal laser scanning microscopic images. In contrast, the big RW/GL loops lead to a mostly homogeneous chromatin distribution. Even small changes of the model parameters induced significant rearrangements of the chromatin morphology. The low overlap of chromosomes, arms, and subchromosomal domains observed in experiments agrees only with the MLS model. The chromatin density distribution in CLSM image stacks reveals a bimodal behaviour in agreement with recent experiments. Combination of these results with a variety of (spatial distance) measurements favour an MLS like model with loops and linkers of 63 to 126 kbp. The predicted large spaces between the chromatin fibres allow typically sized biological molecules to reach nearly every location in the nucleus by moderately obstructed diffusion and is in disagreement with the much simplified assumption that defined channels between territories for molecular transport as in the Interchromosomal Domain (ICD) hypothesis exist and are necessary for transport. All this is also in agreement with recent selective high-resolution chromosome interaction capture (T2C) experiments, the scaling behaviour of the DNA sequence, the dynamics of the chromatin fibre, the diffusion of molecules, and other measurements. Also all other chromosome topologies can in principle be excluded. In summary, polymer simulations of whole nuclei compared to experimental data not only clearly favour only a stable loop aggregate/rosette like genome architecture whose local topology is tightly connected to the global morphology and dynamics of the cell nucleus and hence can be used for understanding genome organization also in respect to diagnosis and treatment. This is in agreement with and also leads to a general novel framework of genome emergence, function, and evolution.

Indexed as

Cell NucleusChromatinChromosomesInterphasePolymersChromatinPolymersChromatin flexibilityFluorescence in situ hybridizationGenome organizationInterphase chromosome structureMonte- Carlo/Brownian dynamicsNuclear architectureParallel high-performance computingSimulated confocal and electron microscopyWormlike chain polymer model

Identifiers

PMID36348120
OpenAlexW4308684043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.