Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36348091›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2023

Positional MR imaging of normal and injured knees.

James F Griffith, Cynthia T P Leung, Jeremiah C H Lee, Jason C S Leung, David K W Yeung, Patrick S H Yung

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

James F GriffithDepartment of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. griffith@cuhk.edu.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5206-9382
Cynthia T P LeungDepartment of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Jeremiah C H LeeDepartment of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Jason C S LeungJockey Club Centre for Osteoporosis Care and Control, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
David K W YeungDepartment of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Patrick S H YungDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Chinese University of Hong Kong · HK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study uses a practical positional MRI protocol to evaluate tibiofemoral translation and rotation in normal and injured knees.

methodsFollowing ethics approval, positional knee MRI of both knees was performed at 35° flexion, extension, and hyperextension in 34 normal subjects (mean age 31.1 ± 10 years) and 51 knee injury patients (mean age 36.4 ± 11.5 years, ACL tear n = 23, non-ACL injury n = 28). At each position, tibiofemoral translation and rotation were measured.

resultsNormal knees showed 8.1 ± 3.3° external tibial rotation (i.e., compatible with physiological screw home mechanism) in hyperextension. The unaffected knee of ACL tear patients showed increased tibial anterior translation laterally (p = 0.005) and decreased external rotation (p = 0.002) in hyperextension compared to normal knees. ACL-tear knees had increased tibial anterior translation laterally (p < 0.001) and decreased external rotation (p < 0.001) compared to normal knees. Applying normal thresholds, fifteen (65%) of 23 ACL knees had excessive tibial anterior translation laterally while 17 (74%) had limited external rotation. None (0%) of 28 non-ACL-injured knees had excessive tibial anterior translation laterally while 13 (46%) had limited external rotation. Multidirectional malalignment was much more common in ACL-tear knees.

conclusionsPositional MRI shows (a) physiological tibiofemoral movement in normal knees, (b) aberrant tibiofemoral alignment in the unaffected knee of ACL tear patients, and (c) a high frequency of abnormal tibiofemoral malalignment in injured knees which was more frequent, more pronounced, more multidirectional, and of a different pattern in ACL-tear knees than non-ACL-injured knees. KEY POINTS: • Positional MRI shows physiological tibiofemoral translation and rotation in normal knees. • Positional MRI shows a different pattern of tibiofemoral alignment in the unaffected knee of ACL tear patients compared to normal control knees. • Positional MRI shows a high prevalence of abnormal tibiofemoral alignment in injured knees, which is more frequent and pronounced in ACL-tear knees than in ACL-intact injured knees.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesJoint InstabilityAdultAnterior Cruciate LigamentBiomechanical PhenomenaCadaverHumansKnee JointMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedRange of Motion, ArticularTibiaYoung AdultACL tearKnee instabilityMRITibiofemoral translation

Identifiers

PMID36348091
OpenAlexW4308566851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.