Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36347970›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Analysis of Early Iron Age (2500 BP) and modern period (150 BP) starch grains in Western Central Africa.

Clarissa Cagnato, Pascal Nlend, François Ngouoh, Richard Oslisly, Geoffroy de Saulieu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Early anthropogenic impact on Western Central African rainforests 2,600 y ago.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Clarissa CagnatoUMR 7041 ArScAn, équipe environnementales, MSH MONDES, 92000, Nanterre, France. ccagnato@wustl.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2010-1437
Pascal NlendDépartement des Arts et de l'Archéologie et Centre de Recherche et d'Expertise scientifique, Université de Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Cameroun.ORCID 0000-0002-5002-9018
François NgouohDépartement des Arts et de l'Archéologie et Centre de Recherche et d'Expertise scientifique, Université de Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Cameroun.ORCID 0000-0002-6393-3997
Richard OslislyCellule Scientifique de l'Agence Nationale des Parcs Nationaux du Gabon, Libreville, Gabon.ORCID 0000-0003-3676-0848
Geoffroy de SaulieuIRD UMR 2008 PALOC (MNHN), 75005, Paris, France. geoffroy.desaulieu@ird.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-7182-9436

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-18-CE01-0005NHPC C035-DES-2019 NHPC-IRD
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Starch grain analysis carried out on 23 ceramic sherds from 6 refuse pits from the site of Nachtigal in central Cameroon is shedding light on a longstanding debate regarding ancient diets in Central Africa during the Iron Age (IA, 2500 years BP) but also more recently during the Modern Period (ca. 150 BP). The results indicate a varied, but balanced diet, consisting of cereals, legumes, oil-rich seeds, and tubers; the latter being very rarely documented in the region. Moreover, we underscore the presence of taxa still consumed today, or in recent times. Rescue archaeology, and the application of specialized methodologies, are critical to better nuancing past dietary practices in this region.

Indexed as

ArchaeologyStarchAfrica, CentralDietEdible GrainSeedsStarch

Identifiers

PMID36347970
PMCPMC9643481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.